Evidence‐based nursing outputs and hot spot analysis of the last 5 years in mainland China: Results of a bibliometric analysis

Zhao, Junqiang; Liu, Xinjuan; Zhang, Wei; Xing, Yanwei; Cho, Sang Wouk; Hao, Yufang

doi:10.1111/ijn.12628

Cited by 18 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This led to a change in the questionnaire from a five-to an eight-factor structure. The differences in the two structures may have resulted from the late introduction of an EBP culture in nursing in China and the less well-developed understanding of EBP by clinical nurses [5]. The three-order factor model in the CFA conducted to verify the reformed structure of the revised 45 items demonstrated a comparably good model of fit.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of the Chinese version of the evidence-based practice profile questionnaire (EBP2Q)

McEvoy

et al. 2020

BMC Med Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) education or training are considered fundamental to building and strengthening an EBP culture, as well as to encouraging evidence-based academic and clinical practice in the nursing community. However, few valid and reliable instruments are available for the assessment of EBP teaching and learning in clinical nurses in China. Translation, reliability, and validity testing of the English Evidence-Based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP 2 Q), which has strong psychometric properties, may encourage evaluation and promote the implementation of EBP in Mainland China. Methods: Based on established guidelines for the development of questionnaires, the English EBP 2 Q was translated and cross-culturally adapted. The Chinese version of the EBP 2 Q (EBP 2 Q-C) was validated using a sample of 543 nurses. Structural validity was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, and the questionnaire was tested for convergent and criterion validity. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were also evaluated. Results: The content validity index demonstrated good content validity (≥0.98). An eight-factor structure was obtained in the exploratory factor analysis, and verified by a three-order factor model from the confirmatory factor analysis (χ 2 /df = 2.001; RMSEA = 0.065; SRMR = 0.077; and CFI = 0.884). The Spearman's rank correlation analysis of the EBP 2 Q-C with the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire showed moderate correlations for Practice (0.58) and Confidence (0.68) and a low correlation for Sympathy (0.32). Criterion validity was demonstrated by significant differences in terms of nurses' highest education, present position, EBP training, involvement in research programs, and level of understanding of English. Both the overall Cronbach's α and the Cronbach's α for the domains exceeded 0.70. The intraclass correlation coefficients for the domains ranged between 0.75 and 0.96, indicating satisfactory repeatability. Conclusions: Except for the convergent validity of the Sympathy domain, the EBP 2 Q-C provided evidence of validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be applied in EBP education or training assessment in Mainland China.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of the Chinese version of the evidence-based practice profile questionnaire (EBP2Q)

McEvoy

et al. 2020

BMC Med Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cook et al () highlighted that it is critical to show the value of nursing through high‐quality and well‐designed economic evaluation research. More importance should also be attached to the appropriate methods of conducting evidence‐based nursing research (Zhao et al, ). Behavioural science such as big data and quantitative science as well as patient‐reported outcomes and health economics are relevant to nursing research, and more stress should be put on these areas and data collection methods (Bates, Saria, Ohno‐Machado, Shah, & Escobar, ; Brennan & Bakken, ; Henly, McCarthy, Wyman, Alt‐White, et al, ; Henly, McCarthy, Wyman, Heitkemper, et al, ; Westra et al, ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nursing science researchers are of the opinion that more randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, meta-synthesis, experimental and intervention studies are needed (Baldi et al, 2014;Richards, Coulthard, & Borglin, 2014 More importance should also be attached to the appropriate methods of conducting evidence-based nursing research (Zhao et al, 2018).…”

Section: Methodology Of Nursing Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review

Hopia

Heikkila

2019

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To analyse nursing research based on the CINAHL database to identify research priorities for nursing. Design A scoping literature review was conducted. The CINAHL Plus (EBSCO) Full Text was searched between 2012–2018. Methods Out of 1522 original publications, 91 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were applied. Data were analysed by a thematic analysis method. Results A strong emphasis should be put on development and evaluation of nursing theories and, in addition, randomized controlled trial studies, meta‐synthesis, experimental and intervention studies are needed in nursing research. Development of competencies and skills in the nursing profession ought to be studied more extensively and research should be focused on variety fields of nursing practice.

show abstract

“…China is one of the countries with the largest nursing staff ranks in the world . EBP was introduced into the nursing profession of China in 2001 and has gradually developed in the following dozen years . But studies have shown that there are still significant challenges for nurses in China to utilize and implement EBP.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…But studies have shown that there are still significant challenges for nurses in China to utilize and implement EBP. Nurses lack deeply understanding of the essence of EBP and how it is combined with clinical nursing practice . Multiple barriers and facilitators have been widely discussed in the literatures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability study of the Quick‐EBP‐VIK instrument: Chinese version

Zhou

Wang

et al. 2018

Evaluation Clinical Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rationale, aims, and objectives: Valid and reliable instruments for measuring are needed. To add knowledge to the subject of tools of evidence-based practice (EBP) evaluation in mainland China, the present study aims to translate the Quick-EBP-VIK into Chinese, which is an instrument for the assessment of nurses' value, knowledge, and implementation of EBP, and to evaluate the metric characteristics of the Chinese version.Methods: In this methodological study, a total sample of 402 nurses from mainland China was applied. Construct validity was evaluated by using factor analysis and further supported through known-group validity. A panel of experts examined the content validity. Internal consistency was determined using composite reliability and Cronbach alpha. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess test-retest reliability.Results: The exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure model same to the original instrument. The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit model with a comparative fit index of 0.957 and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.065. Significant differences were found in the item means of the tool between nurses who received EBP training and those who had not, which supported the known-group validity. The Cronbach alpha and composite reliability for the three subscales were all higher than 0.70. The ICC ranged from 0.569 to 0.928 for the three subscales and from 0.494 to 0.903 for the items included in the instrument. Conclusion:The Chinese version of the Quick-EBP-VIK has evidence of acceptable reliability and validity and can be used to measure value, knowledge, and implementation of EBP for Chinese nurses.

show abstract

Evidence‐based nursing outputs and hot spot analysis of the last 5 years in mainland China: Results of a bibliometric analysis

Abstract: Evidence-based nursing has penetrated into various nursing branches in mainland China and become a well-recognized and relatively mature research domain. More importance should be attached to the study design, methodological, and reporting quality of evidence-based nursing projects.

Cited by 18 publications

References 24 publications

Development and validation of the Chinese version of the evidence-based practice profile questionnaire (EBP2Q)

Development and validation of the Chinese version of the evidence-based practice profile questionnaire (EBP2Q)

Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review

Translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability study of the Quick‐EBP‐VIK instrument: Chinese version

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About