Background:
Nurse educators at a public university expanded their standardized examination program in Spring 2020 to include more specialty examinations, required remediation, and retesting for students who did not attain benchmark scores. This study conducted a remediation-focused program evaluation.
Method:
A mixed-methods design was used. Aggregated deidentified Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) specialty examination scores (
n
= 907) were analyzed. Feedback from nursing students and recent alumni (
n
= 70) was collected using a Qualtrics survey.
Results:
For students scoring under benchmark, higher remediation time requirements led to greater increases in second-attempt specialty examination scores. More alumni than current students reported remediation was helpful (
p
= .029). Participants' perspectives regarding remediation barriers, helpful strategies, and motivating policies were identified. Five themes emerged from open-ended survey comments, adding depth to the quantitative findings.
Conclusion:
Recommendations for standardized examination remediation strategies and policies are offered.
[
J Nurs Educ
. 2023;62(9):519–522.]