2005
DOI: 10.2172/878781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a Canonical GRB Afterglow Light Curve in the Swift/XRT Data

Abstract: We present new observations of the early X-ray afterglows of the first 27 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected with the Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT). The early X-ray afterglows show a canonical behavior, where the light curve broadly consists of three distinct power law segments: (i) an initial very steep decay (∝ t −α with 3 α 1 5) , followed by (ii) a very shallow decay (0.2 α 2 0.8), and finally (iii) a somewhat steeper decay (1 α 3 1.5). These power law -2 -segments are separated by two corresponding break time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
86
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we report on Swift observations of GRB050126 and GRB050219A (see also Tagliaferri et al 2005;Nousek et al 2005;, for a discussion of the average early X-ray light-curve behaviour of a sample of Swift detected GRBs), two bursts for which we have early observations (within ∼100 s) in the XRT and which show similar behaviour in their prompt X-ray light-curves. In Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Here we report on Swift observations of GRB050126 and GRB050219A (see also Tagliaferri et al 2005;Nousek et al 2005;, for a discussion of the average early X-ray light-curve behaviour of a sample of Swift detected GRBs), two bursts for which we have early observations (within ∼100 s) in the XRT and which show similar behaviour in their prompt X-ray light-curves. In Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1 in Nousek et al, 2005) (at about 3000s, there is a steep decay). However, GRB 050315 (Vaughan et al, 2005) can be classified into the case that "normal" afterglow exceed the shallow tail emission before the tail emission breaks to steep phase.…”
Section: Shallow Decay Of Early X-ray Afterglowmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Considering the zero point effect of time, the light curves can be steeper during a short period (Nousek et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2006). Nousek et al (2005) and Zhang et al (2005) have also shown that a shallow decay with index of about −1/2 follows the steep decay for most X-ray afterglows. For the Xray afterglow of short burst GRB 050709, there is an unexpected high-flux point followed by a very steep decay (Fox et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic analysis of their light curves has evidenced several common features (Nousek et al, 2005;Chincarini et al, 2005). During the first few hundred seconds, a steep decay is often observed (α ≈ 3-5; Tagliaferri et al, 2005a), usually interpreted as the tail emission from the prompt GRB (e.g.…”
Section: The X-ray Light Curvementioning
confidence: 98%
“…During the first year of operation, Swift has observed some 75 GRB afterglows, already doubling the pre-Swift sample. This rich dataset has allowed to study in detail the X-ray light curves, both at early and late times, leading to the discovery of a complex behaviour (e.g Tagliaferri et al, 2005a;Nousek et al, 2005;Chincarini et al, 2005;Cusumano et al, 2005a). Coupled with optical data, either from UVOT (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%