2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a functional interaction between the Bari1 transposable element and the cytochrome P450 cyp12a4 gene in Drosophila melanogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This possibility is further strengthened by a recent study demonstrating that insertions by various forms of a truncated on-LTR retrotransposon in the 5'-flanking sequence of CYP51 (encoding a 14α-demethylase) lead to overexpression of CYP51 and sterol demethylation inhibitor fungicide resistance in the cherry leaf spot pathogen Blumeriella jaapii [65]. In the case of the D. melanogaster CYP12A4, the insertion of Bari1 in the 3' UTR results in 10-fold overexpression of CYP12A4 but no resistance to DDT [66], indicating that DDT is not a substrate of CYP12A4. Given that overexpression of CYP12A4 confers resistance to lufenuron [34], it is possible the Bari1 insertion in the 3' UTR of CYP12A4 will lead to resistance to lufenuron even other insecticides or plant toxins.…”
Section: Cyp302a1mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This possibility is further strengthened by a recent study demonstrating that insertions by various forms of a truncated on-LTR retrotransposon in the 5'-flanking sequence of CYP51 (encoding a 14α-demethylase) lead to overexpression of CYP51 and sterol demethylation inhibitor fungicide resistance in the cherry leaf spot pathogen Blumeriella jaapii [65]. In the case of the D. melanogaster CYP12A4, the insertion of Bari1 in the 3' UTR results in 10-fold overexpression of CYP12A4 but no resistance to DDT [66], indicating that DDT is not a substrate of CYP12A4. Given that overexpression of CYP12A4 confers resistance to lufenuron [34], it is possible the Bari1 insertion in the 3' UTR of CYP12A4 will lead to resistance to lufenuron even other insecticides or plant toxins.…”
Section: Cyp302a1mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…TEs can cause mutations by inserting into the coding regions of genes and disrupting or altering gene function. There are also examples of TEs inserting into the untranslated regions (UTRs) of genes, changing transcript length and stability (Landry et al 2002;Dunn et al 2003;Marsano et al 2005). Insertions of TEs into the regulatory regions of genes can also disrupt or alter gene expression, by introducing regulatory elements such as enhancers (Argeson et al 1996;Conte et al 2002) or insulators (Gdula et al 1996;Conte et al 2002;Parnell et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a long predicted role of TEs in the evolution of insecticide resistance (Wilson 1993). However, it is only recently that resistance mechanisms potentially involving TEs have been identified in natural insect populations (ffrench-Constant et al 2006), where resistance is associated with either the deletion or the inactivation of an insecticide target protein (Gahan et al 2001), the truncation of a gene resulting in the generation of a protein with novel function (Aminetzach et al 2005), or the increased expression of a gene associated with metabolic insecticide resistance (Daborn et al 2002;Schlenke and Begun 2004;Marsano et al 2005). Both for insecticide resistance examples and for other examples of TE-associated insertions, rarely has the effect of the mutation caused by the TE been fully characterized at the molecular level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobilization of DNA, moreover, is not solely a past event, but is ongoing in natural populations, where it may underlie evolutionary adaptation. In Drosophila, for example, the insertion of transposable elements into proximal promoters of heat-shock and cytochrome P450 genes, which thereafter segregate as alleles in natural populations, underlies adaptation to temperature and insecticides, respectively (Michalak et al 2001;Daborn et al 2002;McCollum et al 2002;Lerman et al 2003;Petrov et al 2003;Schlenke and Begun 2004;Aminetzach et al 2005;Bogwitz et al 2005;Lerman and Feder 2005;Marsano et al 2005). Importantly, transposition into genes is not random, but requires insertion sites that are physically accessible to the transposition machinery, and all genes (or regions of genes) are not equal in providing access (Bellen et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%