1987
DOI: 10.1038/326052a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a larger Sun with a slower rotation during the seventeenth century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Gleissberg cycle, the published observations disagree with each other. In one modern investigation, the maximum diameter was judged to have occurred around the time of maximum surface activity (Parkinson et al 1980;Parkinson 1983); in other investigations, the diameter increased around the time of minimum surface activity (Dunham et al 1980;Gilliland 1981;Ribes et al 1987), while further studies have found no significant diameter change at all (Shapiro 1980;Morrison et al 1988;Toulmonde 1997). The historical results suggest only that .…”
Section: Virial Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Gleissberg cycle, the published observations disagree with each other. In one modern investigation, the maximum diameter was judged to have occurred around the time of maximum surface activity (Parkinson et al 1980;Parkinson 1983); in other investigations, the diameter increased around the time of minimum surface activity (Dunham et al 1980;Gilliland 1981;Ribes et al 1987), while further studies have found no significant diameter change at all (Shapiro 1980;Morrison et al 1988;Toulmonde 1997). The historical results suggest only that .…”
Section: Virial Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of these historical radius measurements shows that the solar diameter was systematically larger during the years 1660-1720, as already pointed out by Ribes et al (1987Ribes et al ( , 1993. Obviously, these measurements remain open to criticism (see for instance O'Dell & Van Helden 1987).…”
Section: Early Measurements Of the Solar Diametermentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The solar image was too small to observe other than relatively large sunspots, but enough to estimate the coordinates of sunspots by measuring the contact times of the sunspot and the solar limb (Ribes, Ribes, and Barthalot, 1987). Some pictures and the applied method of measurements of sunspot coordinates by Picard and de La Hire suggest that the observed sunspots were large.…”
Section: The Minimum As Described In Terms Of Sunspot Number and Freqmentioning
confidence: 98%