1990
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(90)90617-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a new surface state of hydrogen on Ni(111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the nomenclature of published hydrogen TPD results, we identify the new peak as the β 3 state. The desorption temperature for this new state is similar to several well-known subsurface hydrogen states on the Ni(100), Ni(111), and Cu(110) surfaces. In addition, this new form of hydrogen activates adsorbed cyclopropane as previously observed for the subsurface state on nickel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Following the nomenclature of published hydrogen TPD results, we identify the new peak as the β 3 state. The desorption temperature for this new state is similar to several well-known subsurface hydrogen states on the Ni(100), Ni(111), and Cu(110) surfaces. In addition, this new form of hydrogen activates adsorbed cyclopropane as previously observed for the subsurface state on nickel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For the CH 3 I + D case, a reaction cross section smaller by a factor of 1.4 provides a good fit to the data (see Table ). This simple site-blocking model adequately describes all the kinetic results without the need to invoke nonlocal site effects such as compressed overlayers or island formation. In the case of extremely crowded initial conditions (such as saturation preadsorption of hydrogen), however, the assumed initial number of empty sites is inadequate to hold the methyl iodide dissociation products without including compression and/or displacement effects.
12 Comparisons between the TPD yields of α-methane and kinetic model predictions: (a) dependence of yield on hydrogen precoverage at relatively constant methyl iodide coverage ((0.14 ± 0.02) × 10 15 /cm 2 ); (b) dependence of yield on methyl iodide coverage at two values of hydrogen precoverage (○, 1.1 × 10 15 /cm 2 ; ·, 1.3 × 10 15 /cm 2 ).
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly we did not see any evidence for extra adsorption states, or surface damage, caused by ion exposure. 26 Chorkendor † et al 15 observed that the subsurface TPD peaks shifted to higher temperatures as the ion energy was increased above 1 keV. This reÑects the implantation depth of D into the bulk and the kinetics of di †usion back to the surface, with formation of trapping states becoming important at higher energies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%