-We studied a reproducible fine structure observed in dynamic conductance spectra of Andreev arrays in Sm1−xThxOFeAs superconductors with various thorium concentrations (x = 0.08-0.3) and critical temperatures Tc = 26-50 K. This structure is unambiguously caused by a multiple boson emission (of the same energy) during the process of multiple Andreev reflections. The directly determined energy of the bosonic mode reaches ε0 = 14.8 ± 2.2 meV for optimal compound. Within the studied range of Tc, this energy as well as the large ∆L and the small ∆S superconducting gaps, nearly scales with critical temperature with the characteristic ratio ε0/kBTc ≈ 3.2 (and 2∆L/kBTc ≈ 5.3, correspondingly) resembling the expected energy ∆L + ∆S of spin resonance and spectral density enhancement in s ± and s ++ states, respectively.Fe-based superconductors Sm 1−x Th x OFeAs belong to the oxypnictide family (so called 1111), and have rather simple crystal structure, resembling the stack of superconducting FeAs blocks alternating with Sm 1−x Th x O spacers along the c-direction [1]. Under electron doping, the T c varies in the wide range, reaching 54 K at x ≈ 0.3 nominal concentration [1,2]. Band-structure calculations [3] showed the density of states at the Fermi level formed mainly by iron 3d states. For this reason, the (Sm,Th) substitution affecting the spacer structure barely seems not changing the underlying pairing mechanism [4]. The Fermi surface consists of tubular sections, electron-like near the M point of the first Brillouin zone, and hole-like near the Γ point, both with no significant k z anisotropy [3,5].The majority of theoretical and experimental studies [3][4][5][6][7][8] suppose two superconducting condensates developing below T c . Earlier we reported the scaling between both gaps (∆ L -large gap, ∆ S -small gap) and T c , keeping 2∆ S /k B T c ≈ 1.2 − 1.6 and 2∆ L /k B T c = 5. 0−5.7 [4,9-11]. Similar 2∆ L /k B T c was obtained in literature for Sm-1111 in point-contact probes [12,13], and for various other 1111 [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Both BCS-ratios diverge from the weakcoupling BCS prediction due to a strong coupling in the "driving" bands where the large gap is developed, and a k-space proximity effect with the "driven" ∆ S bands. The pairing p-1