1959
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.116.897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Antiferromagnetism in CoBr2·6H2O

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to this report of Metselaar & De Klerk (1973), and remarkably, after it as well, the isomorphism was apparently merely assumed or misderived from the report of Stroganov et al (1961) notwithstanding their explicit assertion of the lack of isomorphism. As a consequence of the invariable assessment that the chloride and bromide are isomorphic, no alterations to the conclusions of the numerous papers on the magnetic properties of cobalt bromide hexa-hydrate (beginning with the report of antiferromagnetism in this salt by Forstat, Taylor & Spence, 1959) are required. This is rather surprising since the sole published structural study was incorrect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to this report of Metselaar & De Klerk (1973), and remarkably, after it as well, the isomorphism was apparently merely assumed or misderived from the report of Stroganov et al (1961) notwithstanding their explicit assertion of the lack of isomorphism. As a consequence of the invariable assessment that the chloride and bromide are isomorphic, no alterations to the conclusions of the numerous papers on the magnetic properties of cobalt bromide hexa-hydrate (beginning with the report of antiferromagnetism in this salt by Forstat, Taylor & Spence, 1959) are required. This is rather surprising since the sole published structural study was incorrect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%