1980
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(80)91447-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for essential thiol groups and disulfide bonds in agonist and antagonist binding to the dopamine receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, a similar discrepancy between iodoacetamine and NEM effects was also reported for doparnine (8) or histamine receptors (10), and this may be attributed to a participation of the micro environment of the thiol in the accessibility or reactivity of the latter to various thiol reagents. Furthermore, to investigate the characteris tics of the inhibitory potencies of these thiol reagents, we examined the effect of tem perature on the rate of inactivation of [3H] tryptamine binding, because the pretreatment condition of these reagents (i.e., 55-min in cubation at 37'C) also corresponds to the preincubation conditions of the membranes that induce the augmentation of specific [3H]tryptamine binding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Likewise, a similar discrepancy between iodoacetamine and NEM effects was also reported for doparnine (8) or histamine receptors (10), and this may be attributed to a participation of the micro environment of the thiol in the accessibility or reactivity of the latter to various thiol reagents. Furthermore, to investigate the characteris tics of the inhibitory potencies of these thiol reagents, we examined the effect of tem perature on the rate of inactivation of [3H] tryptamine binding, because the pretreatment condition of these reagents (i.e., 55-min in cubation at 37'C) also corresponds to the preincubation conditions of the membranes that induce the augmentation of specific [3H]tryptamine binding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…These observations imply that the D 1 -like receptor conformation through which G αq is activated requires intact, DTT-accessible, disulfide bonds, whereas the G s /AC-coupled D 1 -like conformation might be less susceptible to, or might even benefit from, a thiol-reducing environment. A number of earlier reports showed diverse effects of reducing agents on dopamine agonist and antagonist binding to dopamine receptors, and others showed that agonist stimulation of dopamine-sensitive AC could be inhibited by the thiol-alkylating reagent n-ethylmaleimide but not by DTT (38)(39)(40)(41)(42). Perhaps, these different D 1 -like "sites" are different oligomeric conformations of the known D 1 -like (D 1 /D 1A and/or D 5 /D 1B ) receptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It had been previously found-that antagonist binding to 12 receptor was inhibited by sulfhydryl reagents (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Although most of the reagents used were hydrophobic and could have reacted with cysteines anywhere in the protein, the polar reagents Hg2+ and 5,5'-dithio(bis-2-nitrobenzoate) also inhibited binding to the D2 receptor (25,26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%