2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-015-1172-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for expansion of the precuneus in human evolution

Abstract: The evolution of neurocranial morphology in Homo sapiens is characterized by bulging of the parietal region, a feature unique to our species. In modern humans, expansion of the parietal surface occurs during the first year of life, in a morphogenetic stage which is absent in chimpanzees and Neandertals. A similar variation in brain shape among living adult humans is associated with expansion of the precuneus. Using MRI-derived structural brain templates, we compare medial brain morphology between humans and ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
120
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
9
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, if we compare the midsagittal brain morphology in humans and chimpanzees, we also find that their main difference concerns the extension of the precuneus, which is much larger in our species [Bruner et al, 2017c]. This difference seems, again, to be localized in the dorsal and anterior part of the precuneus, a region that matches the area 7a according to Scheperjians et al [2008].…”
Section: The Living Evidence: Parietal Lobe Morphologysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Interestingly, if we compare the midsagittal brain morphology in humans and chimpanzees, we also find that their main difference concerns the extension of the precuneus, which is much larger in our species [Bruner et al, 2017c]. This difference seems, again, to be localized in the dorsal and anterior part of the precuneus, a region that matches the area 7a according to Scheperjians et al [2008].…”
Section: The Living Evidence: Parietal Lobe Morphologysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It is also hypothesized that L was displaced caudally during hominin evolution, and recent evidence confirms that its "true" homologue eventually disappeared [Allen et al, 2006;Alves et al, 2012]. The newly described sulcal variations described above for chimpanzees suggest that, among other factors [Bruner et al, 2017], L may have been lost in conjunction with the full emergence of two annectant gyri (1 and 2), one of which entailed expansion of the angular gyrus (BA 39) -a region that is also important for human language. Significantly, the new sulcal variations reported here for both frontal and parietooccipital regions in chimpanzee brains are consistent with comparative diffusion tensor imaging findings from studies of a white-matter tract, the arcuate fasciculus, which arches around the Sylvian fissure linking temporal and frontal lobe areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Frontal lobe sulcal configurations that were previously believed to be derived in australopithecines (compared to apes) are represented in some of the newly described chimpanzee brains, and this finding overturns certain published hypotheses about frontal lobe evolution in small-brained hominins. Newly described variations in the superficial representation of two gyri that connect parietal and occipital cortices in chimpanzees and humans contribute to hypotheses about the specific mechanisms that may have been involved in evolutionary reorganization of the caudal part of the brain [Bruner et al, 2017]. Although it is beyond the scope of the present paper, future researchers who apply geometric morphometric approaches to the study of chimpanzee sulci [e.g., Gómez-Robles et al, 2015;Bruner et al, 2017] or wish to construct probability maps that illustrate variation in the locations of various sulci for chimpanzees [e.g., Schenker et al, 2010], as has been done for humans [Iaria and Petrides, 2007], will, of course, require accurate identifications of sulci as an initial step and should, thus, find the above descriptions useful.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations