2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for frequency-based constituents in the mental lexicon: collocations involving the word

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

12
91
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
12
91
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with previous studies in the field of language production that have examined the impact of phrase frequency on measures of phonological reduction [26], and agrees with findings from the field of language comprehension [17,[20][21][22][23][24][25]. For example, as discussed in the Introduction, Arnon and Snider [17] found that recognition times of multi-word phrases were sensitive to the frequency with which the phrases appeared in the language.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is in line with previous studies in the field of language production that have examined the impact of phrase frequency on measures of phonological reduction [26], and agrees with findings from the field of language comprehension [17,[20][21][22][23][24][25]. For example, as discussed in the Introduction, Arnon and Snider [17] found that recognition times of multi-word phrases were sensitive to the frequency with which the phrases appeared in the language.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results revealed that various eye-movement measures (first pass reading time, total reading time, and fixation count) were sensitive to the frequency with which a token phrase appeared in the language. In addition, a study by Sosa and MacFarlane [21] revealed that the speed with which listeners were able to detect the word 'of' was determined by the frequency of the phrase in which the word appeared. Finally, Bannard and Matthews [22] have shown that two and three-year old infants are better at repeating and producing high (e.g., 'sit in your chair') versus low (e.g., 'sit in your truck') frequency phrases (see [23][24][25] for additional results).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But for collocations in the highest frequency bin, there was a slowdown in reaction times. A similar result is reported in a separate study on the function word of (Sosa & MacFarlane, 2002): detection of of was slower in highly frequent collocations such as kind of (ones that appeared over 800 times per million). These findings are interpreted as evidence for competition between the part and the whole when the whole is frequent enough.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For example, Sosa and MacFarlane (2002) had participants monitor for of in two-word collocations (sort of) varying in frequency. They found that reaction times to of in high frequency phrases were significantly slower than in low frequency ones, indicating that frequent phrases were treated as unitary entities, which hindered access to their individual components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%