1941
DOI: 10.1172/jci101241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for General Distribution of Peripheral Resistance in Coarctation of the Aorta: Report of Three Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1941
1941
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Steele (50) found 44 per cent with a raised diastolic pressure in at least one arm: he used a level of 100 mm. as the upper limit of normal, but the method of recording the diastolic pressure was not described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steele (50) found 44 per cent with a raised diastolic pressure in at least one arm: he used a level of 100 mm. as the upper limit of normal, but the method of recording the diastolic pressure was not described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhalation of CO. was used to estimate circulation time from the lungs to the respiratory center in seven patients (15) (Table II). 5We are indebted to Dr. J. M. Steele for referring Cases 2 and 5 to us. They are Cases A. C. and W. G. in his paper (22). 6 Mascosol, a solution described by Spier, Wright, and Saylor (14) containing magnesium sulphate, calcium gluconate, and sodium chloride, was supplied to us for these studies by The Nepera Chemical Co., Inc., of Yonkers, N. Y. consumption increased slightly at the time of the second estimation but the basal metabolic rate was unchanged (6 per cent and 3 per cent, respectively).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Steele (22) reviewed the knowledge of levels of arterial pressure in 203 cases of coarctation of the aorta and, by intra-arterial measurement, found the diastolic pressure to be elevated above 100 mm. Hg in the femoral as well as the radial arteries in two of three cases he studied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control group consisted of 12 Table I indicates that in the upper extremity maximal muscle blood flow was also significantly decreased (P < 0.05), whereas in the lower extremity there was no difference from normal control levels. Values measured in the upper extremity were lower than in the lower extremity (P < 0.001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%