2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for high degrees of specialisation, evolutionary diversity, and morphological distinctiveness in the genus Bremia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is an increasing body of evidence from recent studies combining molecular phylogenetics with morphological investigations, e.g. from Bremia [9], Peronospora [8], [12], [52], [53], and Hyaloperonospora [54], [55] that sporangial dimensions might be a useful character for species delimitation. In our investigation, there was a positive correlation between the length and the width of sporangia, so the tendency for longer sporangia to also be broader is given.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is an increasing body of evidence from recent studies combining molecular phylogenetics with morphological investigations, e.g. from Bremia [9], Peronospora [8], [12], [52], [53], and Hyaloperonospora [54], [55] that sporangial dimensions might be a useful character for species delimitation. In our investigation, there was a positive correlation between the length and the width of sporangia, so the tendency for longer sporangia to also be broader is given.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of host matrix on sporangial dimensions and a limited number of additional characteristics has already been shown for P. cubensis [26], [33]. But it is currently unclear, how the broad set of characteristics currently used for species delimitation [8], [9], [12], [34] is influenced by the host matrix, and if increasing phylogenetic distance of the hosts would lead to stronger differences in the morphology of the pathogen, or if other factors are more important. In addition, it is important to assess which characters are most and least influenced by the host matrix to enable the identification of characters by which known species on new hosts could be reliably identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar case of evolutionary radiation driven by physiological and ecological similarities of hosts rather than host relationships was documented for the floricolous downy mildews, which constitute a monophyletic lineage of several closely related species parasitizing flowers of various distantly related euasterid hosts (Voglmayr 2003;Thines and Kummer 2013). Therefore, this is another example of the importance of host jumps for speciation in the genus Peronospora (Voglmayr 2003(Voglmayr , 2008Thines et al 2009a, 2011, Thines and Kummer 2013Voglmayr et al 2014b) and downy mildews in general (e.g., Thines et al 2009b;Choi et al 2011b;Runge et al 2011;Thines 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Our results on grapevine downy mildew illustrate how biotrophic plant pathogens can diversify by host plant specialization. They are in agreement with phylogenetic studies that have recently reported the presence of distinct pathogen species on a specific host plant family, including Albugo and Hyaloperonospora on Brassicaceae (Goker et al ., ; Ploch et al ., ), Bremia on Asteraceae (Choi et al ., ), Peronospora on Fabaceae and on Lamiaceae (Garcia‐Blazquez et al ., ; Choi et al ., ; Thines et al ., ) and Peronosclerospora on Poaceae (Telle et al ., ). Nevertheless, the proximal mechanisms responsible for such adaptive radiation in downy mildews remain unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid ecological divergence experienced by plant pathogens implies that many may, in fact, be complexes of sibling species, an idea put forward by Crous & Groenewald (): ‘Show me a plant pathogen, and I will show you a species complex’. Since then, there has been abundant phylogenetic evidence supporting the view that many current names of well‐known plant pathogens actually mask complexes of cryptic species (O'Donnell et al ., ; Steenkamp et al ., ; Fournier et al ., ; Le Gac et al ., ; Garcia‐Blazquez et al ., ; Choi et al ., ). In addition to the divergent selective pressures caused by specialization on the host, plant pathogens have evolved in response to the agro‐ecosystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%