2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4793193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for hydrogen generation in laser- or spark-induced cavitation bubbles

Abstract: Analysis of spatially resolved Z-pinch spectra to investigate the nature of "bright spots" Phys. Plasmas 20, 022707 (2013) Two-dimensional space-resolved emission spectroscopy of laser ablation plasma in water J. Appl. Phys. 113, 053302 (2013) Direct evidence of mismatching effect on H emission in laser-induced atmospheric helium gas plasma J. Appl. Phys. 113, 053301 (2013) "Water window" sources: Selection based on the interplay of spectral properties and multilayer reflection bandwidth Appl. Phys. Lett… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Varying ∆p likely also varies this gas content, which varies the energy partition into the rebound for spherical collapses [11], and could be the reason for lower ∆p yielding relatively bigger rebounds in Figure 2. Indeed, the gas inside the bubble, in our experiment, likely comprises i) laser-generated gas, as has been reported in the past [12] -we assume this gas pressure to be proportional to the energy deposited by the laser to generate the bubble; ii) non-condensible gas, for which we assume the partial pressure to be proportional to the bubble volume; iii) diffused gas, for which we assume the partial pressure to be proportional to the total exposed bubble surface being covered during its lifetime; and iv) vapour, the partial pressure of which is assumed to be the vapour pressure of the liquid, p v , during most of the bubble's lifetime, but which may act as a non-condensible gas in the final collapse stages due to its condensation rate not being able to keep up with the bubble's rapid reduction in volume [13]. Much more thorough modeling is needed to obtain proper predictions of the gas effects on the rebound dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Varying ∆p likely also varies this gas content, which varies the energy partition into the rebound for spherical collapses [11], and could be the reason for lower ∆p yielding relatively bigger rebounds in Figure 2. Indeed, the gas inside the bubble, in our experiment, likely comprises i) laser-generated gas, as has been reported in the past [12] -we assume this gas pressure to be proportional to the energy deposited by the laser to generate the bubble; ii) non-condensible gas, for which we assume the partial pressure to be proportional to the bubble volume; iii) diffused gas, for which we assume the partial pressure to be proportional to the total exposed bubble surface being covered during its lifetime; and iv) vapour, the partial pressure of which is assumed to be the vapour pressure of the liquid, p v , during most of the bubble's lifetime, but which may act as a non-condensible gas in the final collapse stages due to its condensation rate not being able to keep up with the bubble's rapid reduction in volume [13]. Much more thorough modeling is needed to obtain proper predictions of the gas effects on the rebound dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…7), the plasma has fully recombined ( Fig. 9c), leaving a bubble filled with water vapor and minor amounts of other gases (Sato et al, 2013).…”
Section: Phase I: Bubble Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After either laser-or spark-induced cavitation bubbles collapse, there are undissolved gases. The main component of the gases may be hydrogen produced by the plasma [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%