The ideas and results of Blum, Oosawa, Strohman, and many others are reviewed and, when consolidated with the authors' work, lead to the following picture of muscle protein adenosine triphosphatases (ATPases). Two major features of imiyocin ATPase seem to be a catalytic interaction between enzyme, a metal cation, and the terminal pyrophosphate moiety of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and a rate-retarding interaction between enzyme, Mg++, and the purine ring of ATP. Sulfhydryl groups of the enzyme participate at both loci. In the catalytic interaction anl ionizable group (pK, ca. 6.8) may participate. G-actiin molecules binding ATP (probably by the purine ring) and relieved of their mutual repulsion cooperate in catalysing dephosphorylation, possibly helical, structure of F-actin.IN CONTRIBUTING to this symposium we are tacitly assuming that, as regards our subject, there is no substantial difference between heart and skeletal muscle tissue. It has also to be said that, although ATPases are emphasized in the title and in the paper itself, it is very possible, in view of work such as Strohman's,1 that in situ one or more of these enzymes function in phosphate transfer rather than in ATP hydrolysis. Such a possibility would not vitiate the merit of ATPase studies, since the objectives in most of these studies are clues about enzyme surfaces and enzyme-substrate interactions. For these purposes it is quite legitimate to consider various "acceptors," among them water. At the same time, we must acknowledge that, even if these studies were totally successful and we understood precisely the mechanisms of the enzymes, we would still have to integrate our information with that of other speakers in order to understand how muscle "works."In this paper we shall consider primarily the ATPase activities of myosin and actin, but first it is convenient to touch upon some properties of ATP and its relatives.
SubstratesFor the enzymes to be considered, the "natural" substrate appears to be adenosine triphosphate (ATP). A long-known property of ATP is that its free energy of hydrolysis is substantial. A possible consequence of this fact for interactions of ATP with its enzymes is the plausibility of formation of energetically costly enzyme intermediates. Other conceivable properties of ATP as a substrate, such as charge and binding affinities of its various moieties, have generally received scant attention. In recent years, however, interest in ATP-metal cation complexes has been kindled by mounting evidence that metal cations play a critical role in ATPase and contractile properties.It is safe to assume that metal cations are chelated by the polyphosphate end of ATP and may form a sort of electrostatic "cement " linking substrate to enzyme and facilitating distal hydrolytic attack by water molecules. However, enzymologic investigations have prompted speculation that metal cations also interact with the ring end of ATP, either to anchor it to enzyme or to its own polyphosphate end. The existence of these interactions can be and has ...