1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1095-6433(99)00017-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for load-bearing structures specialized for the catch state in Mytilus smooth muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early after the discovery of twitchin's role some evidence was presented arguing that the stretch resistance was due to long lasting actomyosin cross bridges, with the actomyosin being unable to detach unless twitchin was phosphorylated Funabara and Watabe, 2002). However, studies showing that 1) actively contracting muscles and muscles in catch have different load bearing abilities (Sugi et al, 1999;Mukou et al, 2004), 2) rigor cross-bridge detachment rates are too fast to explain catch time course (Galler et al, 1999), 3) treatments that alter or abolish crossbridge formation do not alter catch Andruchov et al, 2006;Höpflinger et al, 2006), and 4) twitchin phosphorylation does not affect myosin head detachment gradually made that position untenable.…”
Section: Post-1997-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early after the discovery of twitchin's role some evidence was presented arguing that the stretch resistance was due to long lasting actomyosin cross bridges, with the actomyosin being unable to detach unless twitchin was phosphorylated Funabara and Watabe, 2002). However, studies showing that 1) actively contracting muscles and muscles in catch have different load bearing abilities (Sugi et al, 1999;Mukou et al, 2004), 2) rigor cross-bridge detachment rates are too fast to explain catch time course (Galler et al, 1999), 3) treatments that alter or abolish crossbridge formation do not alter catch Andruchov et al, 2006;Höpflinger et al, 2006), and 4) twitchin phosphorylation does not affect myosin head detachment gradually made that position untenable.…”
Section: Post-1997-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…actin-myosin linkages. Recently, however, Sugi et al (1999) have shown that the SEC in the ABRM fibres becomes definitely stiffer in the late phase of the catch state, in which the catch force decays below 0.5P0, which is consistent with the presence of a forcebearing structure other than the actomyosin system. In the present study, the force-extension curves of the SEC for forces >P0 were obtained by applying quick increases in load, and the SEC has also been shown to be definitely stiffer during the catch state than during the maximum active force generation (Fig.·5A).…”
Section: Relation With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…After recording the resulting fibre lengthening, the preparation was restored to its original length and ACh was removed to put the preparation into the catch state, which was established 3-5·min after the ACh removal (Sugi et al, 1999). The preparation was then subjected to quick increases in load at various force levels Px.…”
Section: General Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That only muscle contraction was involved is highly unlikely as estimates of the tensile strength of stiffened mutable echinoderm ligaments [e.g. 6-38 MPa (see Wilkie, 1984)] exceed the maximal contractile tension recorded for any muscle [1.4 MPa for bivalve ABRM (see Sugi et al, 1999)]. Furthermore, with regard specifically to diarthrial flexion in response to elevated [K + ] o and acetylcholine, as these agents destiffen the aboral diarthrial ligament of another crinoid (Motokawa et al, 2004), it is reasonable to infer that they had the same effect on the equivalent ligament of A. mediterranea.…”
Section: Significance Of Syzygial and Diarthrial Responses In Isolatementioning
confidence: 99%