2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for non-ischemic scarring in patients with ventricular ectopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten (22%) patients had ≥1 foci of LGE with subepicardial or midmyocardial distribution, possibly related to remote inflammatory tissue injury or underlying nonischemic structural heart disease. 22 One patient had regional signal abnormalities on T2-weighted imaging and regionally matched LGE with nonischemic pattern (findings consistent with acute myocarditis). Finally, 7 patients had signal alterations indicating both myocardial fatty replacement and nonischemic scarring of the LV, mainly involving the inferior and lateral wall; in 1 patient, signal alterations on T1-weighted and LGE imaging involving the RV were also observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ten (22%) patients had ≥1 foci of LGE with subepicardial or midmyocardial distribution, possibly related to remote inflammatory tissue injury or underlying nonischemic structural heart disease. 22 One patient had regional signal abnormalities on T2-weighted imaging and regionally matched LGE with nonischemic pattern (findings consistent with acute myocarditis). Finally, 7 patients had signal alterations indicating both myocardial fatty replacement and nonischemic scarring of the LV, mainly involving the inferior and lateral wall; in 1 patient, signal alterations on T1-weighted and LGE imaging involving the RV were also observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…20,21 Previous studies have investigated the clinical value of cine and T1-weighted cMRI among patients with apparently idiopathic VAs of RV origin [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] ; some authors demonstrated cMRI signal alterations in this group of patients, 5-8 whereas others showed RV wall motion abnormalities without signal alterations [9][10][11] or even any kind of RV abnormalities. [12][13][14] More recently, Jeserich et al 22 and Mavrogeni et al 23 evaluated the value of a cMRI protocol including T2-weighted and LGE imaging in patients with unexplained VAs (frequent PVBs and ventricular tachycardia, respectively); in both studies, LV myocardial structural abnormalities (including nonischemic scarring) were observed in the majority of patients. White et al 4 applied a cMRI protocol with comprehensive tissue characterization (including T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and LGE imaging) in 40 patients with resuscitated SCD or SVT and no abnormal findings on routine diagnostic work-up; half of these patients were diagnosed as having relevant myocardial disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence suggests that even a more accurate screening with surface ECG and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) may not be sensible enough to detect subtle myocardial structural abnormalities . Indeed, when the diagnostic work‐up was implemented with CMR imaging, presence of abnormal myocardial findings could be as high as 50% . Interestingly, when PVCs were identified as truly idiopathic on the basis of accurate screening, they no longer predicted mortality or SCD .…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information derived from experiments in animals suggests that the mechanisms by which PVCs are generated include: re-entry, enhanced normal or abnormal automaticity, triggered activity resulting in after depolarisations. It has been showed that evidence for structural heart disease consistent with non-ischemic scarring possibly due to inflammation in patients with PVCs (8). However, prophylactic treatment of asymptomatic PVCs in patients without cardiomyopathy has not been shown to improve mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there is no clear mortality benefit from PVC suppression in asymptomatic patients. In addition, It has been showed that evidence for structural heart disease consistent with non-ischemic scarring possibly due to inflammation in patients with PVCs (8). This situation suggests that the mechanisms by which PVCs can be also generated with include clinical and subclinical inflammation as well as re-entry, enhanced normal or abnormal automaticity, triggered activity resulting in after depolarizations and also mortality benefit can be related to inhibit clinical and subclinical inflammation rather than triggered activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%