2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for orbital motion of CW Leonis from ground-based astrometry

Abstract: Recent ALMA observations indicate that CW Leo, the closest carbon-rich AGB star to the Sun, might have a low-mass stellar companion. We present archival groundbased astrometric measurements of CW Leo obtained within the context of the Torino Parallax Program and with > 6 yr (1995 − 2001) of time baseline. The residuals to a single-star solution show significant curvature, and they are strongly correlated with the well-known I-band photometric variations due to stellar pulsations. We describe successfully the a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These values agree with the determination of M12 to within uncertainties. Our µ x determination also agrees with Sozzetti et al (2017), but we find significant disagreement in the y component of motion, where the latter authors report µ y =30.22±2.02 mas yr −1 based on a single-star fit to the data and µ y =25.43±1.69 mas yr −1 based on a "VIM+acceleration" model, intended to account from perturbations from a suspected binary companion. A possible explanation for this discrepancy in the y component of motion is that (1969.274, 1987.419, 1993.07, and 2006.145) taken from Becklin et al (1969), Menten et al (2006), and M12.…”
Section: Appendix the Absolute Position And Proper Motion Of Irc+10216supporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These values agree with the determination of M12 to within uncertainties. Our µ x determination also agrees with Sozzetti et al (2017), but we find significant disagreement in the y component of motion, where the latter authors report µ y =30.22±2.02 mas yr −1 based on a single-star fit to the data and µ y =25.43±1.69 mas yr −1 based on a "VIM+acceleration" model, intended to account from perturbations from a suspected binary companion. A possible explanation for this discrepancy in the y component of motion is that (1969.274, 1987.419, 1993.07, and 2006.145) taken from Becklin et al (1969), Menten et al (2006), and M12.…”
Section: Appendix the Absolute Position And Proper Motion Of Irc+10216supporting
confidence: 81%
“…The time elapsed between our recent measurement and the previous high-precision radio measurement of M12 (∼8 yr) is slightly larger than the time span of the measurements presented by Sozzetti et al (2017). However, we find no evidence for excursions of the motion of the star compared with an extrapolation of the data between 1969-2006.…”
Section: Appendix the Absolute Position And Proper Motion Of Irc+10216contrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From various line surveys for IRC+10216, which include molecular lines emanating only in the very central region, the spatial profile of the wind velocity has been explored and the increase of the velocity with radius has been interpreted on the basis of several dust acceleration models (e.g., Patel et al 2011;Decin et al 2015). However, if IRC+10216 is a binary system as proposed by some authors (e.g., Decin et al 2015;Cernicharo et al 2015;Kim et al 2015;Sozzetti et al 2017), the interpretation of its velocity profile requires an additional consideration. As seen in the rightmost column of Figure 5 in the central 100 AU region, the fluid velocity can be accelerated by the gravitational potential of the companion star.…”
Section: Measurement Of Expansion Velocity and Mass-loss Ratementioning
confidence: 99%