1989
DOI: 10.1017/s0252921100109856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Physical Aging of Periodic Comets

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Observational evidence for the aging processes in periodic comets is reviewed. This includes progressive changes of the comets' absolute brightness, sudden destructive events (outbursts and splitting of cometary nuclei), temporary intermissions in activity, total disappearance, and existence of asteroidal objects moving in cometary orbits. Indirect statistical evidence is provided by the equilibrium between the aging rate and the net injection of comets into the inner planetary system. All of this in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where a J is Jupiter's semimajor axis, and a, e, and i are the semimajor axis, eccentricity, and inclination of the particle. It has been shown that T J is a suitable parameter to differentiate between the Jupiter Family and Halley-type comets, both of which are considered SPCs (historically, those with period below 200 yr; the JFCs having periods below 20 yr); however, by only considering the period as a classifying criteria, one ends with a large overlap between both families, thus a dynamically motivated criterion such as T J turns out to be a better choice in defining families among the observed comets, with Halley-types having a T J < 2 (Kresák 1972). In Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a J is Jupiter's semimajor axis, and a, e, and i are the semimajor axis, eccentricity, and inclination of the particle. It has been shown that T J is a suitable parameter to differentiate between the Jupiter Family and Halley-type comets, both of which are considered SPCs (historically, those with period below 200 yr; the JFCs having periods below 20 yr); however, by only considering the period as a classifying criteria, one ends with a large overlap between both families, thus a dynamically motivated criterion such as T J turns out to be a better choice in defining families among the observed comets, with Halley-types having a T J < 2 (Kresák 1972). In Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active asteroids have orbits typical of asteroids (with a Tisserand parameter relative to Jupiter >3, Kresák 1972), but temporarily display dust activity similar to comets (Hsieh & Jewitt 2006;Jewitt 2012;Jewitt et al 2015b). While cometary activity is generally thought to be driven by the sublimation of embedded volatiles (Whipple 1950), the situation is likely more diverse in asteroids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%