2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Proton Shuffling in a Thioredoxin-Like Protein during Catalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After a ligand binds to the EGFR complex, the signal is ultimately propagated in the membrane through GTP binding to RAS [12]. Activated RAS then “recruits” RAF to the cell membrane and adds multiple phosphates [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a ligand binds to the EGFR complex, the signal is ultimately propagated in the membrane through GTP binding to RAS [12]. Activated RAS then “recruits” RAF to the cell membrane and adds multiple phosphates [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium contains, in addition to a DsbA and a DsbB, a second pair of homologues in DsbL and DsbI (with, respectively, 27% and 30% homology to DsbA and DsbB) together in an operon with an aryl sulfate-sulfotransferase, assT, which is dependent on oxidation by DsbL/I for activity. A similar DsbL/DsbI pair was found in uropathogenic E. coli strain CFT073, which is also highly divergent from DsbA/B (19/24% sequence identity) but clearly paralogous in function (93,94). DsbL is more oxidizing than DsbA (redox potential of -95 mV) and differs in the substrate-binding groove harboring basic residues instead of the hydrophobic patch of DsbA, suggesting narrower substrate specificity.…”
Section: Diversity Of Disulfide Bond Formation Pathways In Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The computational cost of such methods is, however, at variance with the need for high throughput, e.g., in protein design or protein–ligand docking and in the pK a analysis of titratable sites as well. The latter problem requires the accurate estimation of the free energy differences between protonated and de-protonated states of all titratable groups in proteins, either on crystal structures or on trajectories obtained from molecular dynamics simulations to better grasp the protein flexibility (Narzi et al, 2008a ). Protonation or pK changes are, e.g., important during the function of enzymes (Narzi et al, 2008a ), or in protein–ligand binding (Narzi et al, 2008b ; Onufriev and Alexov, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%