2011
DOI: 10.1002/hup.1187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for sex differences in the loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential in humans

Abstract: These findings suggest that the LDAEP is modulated by sex potentially because of differences in serotonergic neurotransmission, and these differences may account for some of the inconsistent findings linking serotonin function and LDAEP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the sample in Gudlowski’s study included females and males. Even though some studies reported no gender effects [29], [40], [61], others have documented some effects on the LDAEP [62], [63], [64]. The study by Juckel et al (2008) [39] used comparable methodology to the present study and some results are in line with our findings, showing strong LDAEP in patients with negative symptoms among schizophrenic patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the sample in Gudlowski’s study included females and males. Even though some studies reported no gender effects [29], [40], [61], others have documented some effects on the LDAEP [62], [63], [64]. The study by Juckel et al (2008) [39] used comparable methodology to the present study and some results are in line with our findings, showing strong LDAEP in patients with negative symptoms among schizophrenic patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In our ERP study, the OPS-C scores also did not vary by gender ( P = 0.359) (Table 1). Findings that the mean ASF slopes were higher for female students than male students for the N1 and N1/P2 ASF slopes corroborated a study of gender differences in the LDAEP by Oliva et al [26]. The authors reported that the mean N1/P2 slopes for female participants were higher than those for male participants ( P < 0.0001), suggesting that the LDAEP was modulated by gender associated differences in serotonin transmitters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The amplitudes of N1, P2, and N1/P2 were analyzed in separate analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) with stimulus intensities (60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 dB) as within factor and group (high optimistic/pessimistic) as between factor, controlling for the effect of gender [26]. Reported results were restricted to effects involving the group factor and group-intensity interactions [8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was evidence that the LDAEP is modulated by gender potentially. Oliva and collegues reported that LDAEP for female healthy participants was stronger than that for male healthy participants [44]. There was contrary evidence that female depressed patients showed weaker LDAEP strength than male depressed patients [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To avoid the hormonal effects on LDAEP, LDAEP measurement was conducted during 2 nd to 5 th day after the beginning of menstruation for female subjects [23]. Each subject was seated in a comfortable chair in a sound-attenuated room.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%