1968
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.20.806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Solar-Cycle Changes in the Inner-Belt Protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported a high degree of stability during that period. As solar activity increased after mid-1966, these same authors observed a decrease in the 63-MeV proton population [Nakano and Heckman, 1968] and by mid-1969 (solar maximum) this same population had decreased by about a factor 2 relative to the solar minimum period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…They reported a high degree of stability during that period. As solar activity increased after mid-1966, these same authors observed a decrease in the 63-MeV proton population [Nakano and Heckman, 1968] and by mid-1969 (solar maximum) this same population had decreased by about a factor 2 relative to the solar minimum period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A typical temporal variation in this region is the solar cycle variation [ Nakano and Heckman , ; Dragt , ]. The proton flux variation was first substantiated to be anticorrelated with solar cycle changes in density of the upper atmosphere on the basis of experimental data [ Nakano and Heckman , ]. Using data from the TIROS/NOAA spacecraft, Huston et al [, ] found a definite phase lag when examining the anticorrelation relationship between the F 10.7 flux and the proton flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical temporal variation in this region is the solar cycle variation [Nakano and Heckman, 1968;Dragt, 1971]. The proton flux variation was first substantiated to be anticorrelated with solar cycle changes in density of the upper atmosphere on the basis of experimental data [Nakano and Heckman, 1968].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, at the minima of solar activity, the inner edge of a proton flux radial profiles with E > 1 MeV is less steep and achieves smaller L shells. Solar-cyclic (11-year) variations of proton fluxes with E > 1 MeV in the inner region of the ERB connected mainly with the variations in the concentrations of atoms in the atmosphere (see, e.g., Pizzella et al, 1962;Hess, 1962;Blanchard and Hess, 1964;Filz, 1967;Nakano and Heckman, 1968;Vernov, 1969;Dragt, 1971;Huston et al, 1996;Vacaresse et al, 1999;Kuznetsov et al, 2010;Qin et al, 2014). These variations achieves one order of magnitude at L = 1.14 and reduced rapidly with increasing L (see, e.g., Vacaresse et al, 1999).…”
Section: Invariants Of the Ion Earth's Radiation Belts Structurementioning
confidence: 99%