2005
DOI: 10.1130/g20930.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for temporally changing mechanical stratigraphy and effects on joint-network architecture

Abstract: Previous studies of jointing in sedimentary rocks have shown that joint-network architecture is controlled by mechanical stratigraphy, which is described by (1) the thickness and rigidity of stratigraphic units and (2) the nature of interfaces between beds. Using joint pattern to infer rigidity contrast between beds is complicated by the possibility that material properties of the beds may change between fracturing events. Observation of both an early bed-contained joint set and a differently oriented late thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example in sandstones, as mechanical strength increases due to 54 diagenesis, the failure mechanism can change from cataclasis (forming deformation bands) to 55 fracturing (forming joints) (Johansen et al, 2005; Davatzes et al, 2005). Similarly, fracture 56 attributes such as spacing and length, are the product of the host rock mechanical properties at the 57 time of formation (Cooke et al, 2006;Moir et al, 2010), which may differ from present-day 58 mechanical properties (Shackleton et al, 2005;Laubach et al, 2009). The impact of diagenetic or 59 depositional processes on host rock properties is evident in along fault variations in fault zone 60 architecture (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in sandstones, as mechanical strength increases due to 54 diagenesis, the failure mechanism can change from cataclasis (forming deformation bands) to 55 fracturing (forming joints) (Johansen et al, 2005; Davatzes et al, 2005). Similarly, fracture 56 attributes such as spacing and length, are the product of the host rock mechanical properties at the 57 time of formation (Cooke et al, 2006;Moir et al, 2010), which may differ from present-day 58 mechanical properties (Shackleton et al, 2005;Laubach et al, 2009). The impact of diagenetic or 59 depositional processes on host rock properties is evident in along fault variations in fault zone 60 architecture (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence that some fractures in dolostones may grow slowly over millions of years (e.g. Gale et al 2010) The influence of mechanically stratified carbonate rock sequences on the arrangement and types of fractures is a key to accurate fracture prediction in the all-too-common case where direct fracture observations are inadequate (Shackleton et al 2005;Laubach et al 2009Laubach et al , 2010. Jacquemyn et al (2012) explore the interrelations of mechanical stratigraphy, fractures and dissolution, aiming to define the dominant factors that govern various karst types in outcrops that contain features typical of reservoirs with solution-enhanced fractures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the mechanical stratigraphy is likely to change through time as a result of compaction, diagenesis and tectonism, the mechanical history and fracture network that characterize a particular reservoir will be reservoir specific (e.g. Shackleton et al 2005;Laubach et al 2009). For these reasons, extant mechanical stratigraphy and the accumulated fracture networks should not be uncritically conflated as being coeval when characterizing fractured reservoirs (e.g.…”
Section: Diagenetic Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of fractures in a reservoir is sometimes referred to as 'fracture stratigraphy' (Laubach et al 2009), 'joint-network architecture' (Shackleton et al 2005) or 'fracture network' (e.g. Lonergan et al 2007), as used here.…”
Section: Naturally Fractured Reservoirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation