2007
DOI: 10.1261/rna.619707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for the importance of electrostatics in the function of two distinct families of ribosome inactivating toxins

Abstract: a-Sarcin and ricin represent two structurally and mechanistically distinct families of site-specific enzymes that block translation by irreversibly modifying the sarcin/ricin loop (SRL) of 23S-28S rRNA. a-Sarcin family enzymes are designated as ribotoxins and act as endonucleases. Ricin family enzymes are designated as ribosome inactivating proteins (RIP) and act as N-glycosidases. Recently, we demonstrated that basic surface residues of the ribotoxin restrictocin promote rapid and specific ribosome targeting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R193A/R235A and R189A/R234A could not bind intact ribosomes by Biacore analysis. Because the ribosome is about 120 times bigger than RTA (molecular mass of 30 kDa for RTA and 3600 kDa for the yeast ribosome), to reach the high depurination rate, RTA must have a very high local concentration near the ribosome (52,53). We show here that the seven arginines at the RTA/RTB interface contribute to the positive surface charge, which allows RTA to interact with the ribosome via electrostatic interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…R193A/R235A and R189A/R234A could not bind intact ribosomes by Biacore analysis. Because the ribosome is about 120 times bigger than RTA (molecular mass of 30 kDa for RTA and 3600 kDa for the yeast ribosome), to reach the high depurination rate, RTA must have a very high local concentration near the ribosome (52,53). We show here that the seven arginines at the RTA/RTB interface contribute to the positive surface charge, which allows RTA to interact with the ribosome via electrostatic interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The electrostatic character of the ribosomal surface has been shown to be responsible for the unusually high catalytic activity of ribotoxins and RIPs (52,53). We previously showed that electrostatic interactions concentrate RTA on the ribosome surface and facilitate its interaction with the stalk (18).…”
Section: Double Mutations In Arginines At the Interface Of Rtb Reducementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The faster dissociation rate of RTA with ribosomes than with the isolated stalk might be determined by the ribosomal particle, where dynamics of the stalk may deliver RTA to the SRL by undergoing conformational changes, as proposed for the interaction between the C termini of the stalk proteins and the translation factors (10,42). The electrostatic character of the ribosomal surface was shown to be critical for its interaction with a ribotoxin (43) and for the enzymatic activity of RIPs (44). Similarly, we showed that electrostatic interactions dominated the interaction between RTA and ribosomes, enabling rapid target localization, and accounted for much higher depurination rate of intact ribosomes than of isolated rRNA (40).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, APE1 is a potential candidate enzyme that cleaves damaged abasic-site-containing ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and transfer RNA (tRNA) molecules which pose hindrance to normal protein synthesis (Korennykh et al 2007). APE1…”
Section: Abasic Rna (Ap-rna) Cleavage Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to cleave AP-site-containing RNA implies that APE1 can remove damaged templates from the endogenous pool. This activity provides a possible mechanism for the cell to eliminate damaged RNA prior to association with the ribosome and execution of non-productive translation, i.e., damage to rRNA and tRNA (Berquist et al 2008;Korennykh et al 2007;Cochella et al 2005). Future in vivo work in 70 CHAPTER 5 -GENERAL DISCUSSION understanding the role of these variants may generate valuable insights into understanding their associations with cancers.…”
Section: Abasic Rna Activity Of Ape1mentioning
confidence: 99%