2008
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for the network perspective on organizational learning

Abstract: This article provides evidence for the network perspective on organizational learning in the cases of two companies of different size, industry, and culture. It builds on an earlier article that introduced the network perspective on organizational learning, and proposes some common traits of learning networks and tests them with the help of the tools of social-network analysis. We find support for the network perspective on organizational learning. There are some traits of the learning network that are common … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Members of a variety of social networks would have different tenure homophily, dependent upon when they joined a given social network. Pahor, Škerlavaj, and Dimovski [2008] find a significant influence of tenure homophily on the formation of social ties among people within the organizational context. In a study of online game interactions, Huang, Shen, Williams, and Contractor [2009] find that online gamers were more willing to interact and play with others who had similar tenure in terms of their experience in playing the game.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Members of a variety of social networks would have different tenure homophily, dependent upon when they joined a given social network. Pahor, Škerlavaj, and Dimovski [2008] find a significant influence of tenure homophily on the formation of social ties among people within the organizational context. In a study of online game interactions, Huang, Shen, Williams, and Contractor [2009] find that online gamers were more willing to interact and play with others who had similar tenure in terms of their experience in playing the game.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Continuing professional development consists of both formal and informal learning related to intellectual, personal and social domains (De Laat, Schreurs, & Nijland, 2014), and can be seen as a "non-linear ongoing process rather than as an outcome of linear, one off training events" (Varga-Atkins, O'Brien, Burton, Campbell, & Qualter, 2010, p.42). In addition continuing professional development can be seen as "a flow of acquired knowledge, as well as participation in a learning community" (Pahor, Škerlavaj, & Dimovski, 2008). Notwithstanding the proven significance of informal learning communities, continuing professional development of teachers is almost always approached in a mainly formal manner (Villegas-Reimers, 2003;Darling-Hammond, Wei, Andree, Richardson, & Orphanos, 2009).…”
Section: Greater Use Of Formal and Informal Learning For Cpdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homophily refers to the socio-psychological tendency for people to associate with others who are similar to them, i.e., share beliefs and values, or who are accessible because they share social strata or physical locations (McPherson et al 2001). Even among organizations communication of information tends to follow homophilous patterns in organizational attributes, e.g., shared ideology and power-seeking rationales, and geographic locations (Pahor et al 2008, Škerlavaj et al 2010a, Henry 2011. Homophily can also reflect Ecology and Society 22(1): 23 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss1/art23/ power-seeking rationales, as in the case of organizations with similar goals interacting to leverage each other's resources and form more powerful coalitions.…”
Section: Influences On Network Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource seeking reflects the tendency to search for additional or rare information and resources (Lin 1999, Borgatti andCross 2003). Resource seeking is a common driver of the structure of policy networks (Pahor et al 2008(Pahor et al , Škerlavaj et al 2010a(Pahor et al , 2010b. In network analysis, resource seeking is exhibited when actors in one group reach out to others for information or resources more frequently than would be expected by chance.…”
Section: Influences On Network Structurementioning
confidence: 99%