2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2008.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for the non-pest status of codling moth on commercial fresh sweet cherries intended for export

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, when the United States exported fresh sweet cherries to Japan, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan required a necessary quarantine treatment, methyl bromide fumigation. However, several recent studies indicated that sweet cherry was not a host of coding moth based on experimental evidence and field observation (Johnson & Hansen, 2008; Wearing et al., 2001). They concluded that Japan should accept a systematic approach as an alternative to methyl bromide fumigation which was already banned due to its environmental damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, when the United States exported fresh sweet cherries to Japan, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan required a necessary quarantine treatment, methyl bromide fumigation. However, several recent studies indicated that sweet cherry was not a host of coding moth based on experimental evidence and field observation (Johnson & Hansen, 2008; Wearing et al., 2001). They concluded that Japan should accept a systematic approach as an alternative to methyl bromide fumigation which was already banned due to its environmental damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%