1987
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/4/8/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Two-Centre Effects in the Electron Emission from 25 MeV/u Mo 40+ + He Collisions: Theory and Experiment

Abstract: Absolute doubly differential cross-sections for electron emission in 25 MeVIuMO" + He collisions were measured as a function of the electron energy and emission angle.The data show enhancement at forward angles and reduction at backward angles with respect to results derived using the Born approximation. Comparison with a continuum distorted-wave approximation suggests that this observation can be explained by the combined influence of the projectile and t,arget Coulomb fields on the ejected electron. This two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…p b 2 e, where e ø 1. This behavior has also been encountered in ionatom ionizing collisions (both experimentally and theoretically) [16,23,28,29,[32][33][34][35] and has been dubbed cusp asymmetry. To my knowledge there is as yet no clear physical explanation of the origin of this asymmetry and, as will be shown below, this study sheds new light on this question but certainly does not resolve it.…”
Section: Fig 2 the Same As Inmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…p b 2 e, where e ø 1. This behavior has also been encountered in ionatom ionizing collisions (both experimentally and theoretically) [16,23,28,29,[32][33][34][35] and has been dubbed cusp asymmetry. To my knowledge there is as yet no clear physical explanation of the origin of this asymmetry and, as will be shown below, this study sheds new light on this question but certainly does not resolve it.…”
Section: Fig 2 the Same As Inmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…On the other hand, the phenomenon of electron capture to the projectile's continuum (ECC) is well established in heavy ion-atom ionizing collisions both experimentally and theoretically [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. From these studies it has been concluded that a theoretical description of the energy and angular distributions of the secondary electrons must account for the interaction of these electrons both with the residual ion and the projectile [29]. For light-particle impact, such as positron, the theoretical description is even more challenging, for in this case the projectile is deflected through very large angles [11,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…represents a plane wave in the projectile reference frame, and D+(Z, q~r) = D (Z, q~r)' = N(v) iF, (iv;1;iqr + iq r) (1&) [14].…”
Section: A the Initial Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of such two-center effects has recently been recognized. 12 " 14 The He target was described by the independentelectron model, 15 with an effective charge of 1.6875 and the experimental binding energy of 24.58 eV. It should be noted that the CTMC method directly includes the angular scattering of the projectile, the recoil of the target nucleus (which we have found to be important in the angular scattering of light projectiles), and the effects of electron capture (for positively charged projectiles).…”
Section: Dynamics Of Antimatter-atom Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%