2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence from auditory and visual event-related potential (ERP) studies of deviance detection (MMN and vMMN) linking predictive coding theories and perceptual object representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

12
162
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
(268 reference statements)
12
162
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to recent theories, the (auditory) MMN and vMMN are considered to be error signals that are generated by the discrepancy between the bottom-up flow of information and predictions represented within subsequent processing structures (e.g., Garrido et al, 2009;Kimura et al, 2011, Stefanics et al, 2011Wacongne et al, 2012;Winkler and Czigler, 2012;. According to the predictive coding approach, bottom-up evidence is combined with prior knowledge, and at each level of the hierarchical system, there is a search for a correspondence between bottom-up information and top-down predictions (e.g., Friston, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent theories, the (auditory) MMN and vMMN are considered to be error signals that are generated by the discrepancy between the bottom-up flow of information and predictions represented within subsequent processing structures (e.g., Garrido et al, 2009;Kimura et al, 2011, Stefanics et al, 2011Wacongne et al, 2012;Winkler and Czigler, 2012;. According to the predictive coding approach, bottom-up evidence is combined with prior knowledge, and at each level of the hierarchical system, there is a search for a correspondence between bottom-up information and top-down predictions (e.g., Friston, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this framework MMN can be considered a prediction-error signal (for a discussion of the relation of MMN to predictive coding theories, see Winkler and Czigler 2012). MMN indicates that an auditory input differs from predicted causes and signals the need for two related actions: firstly, the model has proven inaccurate and therefore requires updating (Winkler et al 1996;Winkler 2007), and second, the environment has changed in some way that might require a change in ongoing behaviour (Näätänen 1990;Schröger 1997;Näätänen et al 2011).…”
Section: Mismatch Negativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, MMN responses are increasingly considered as automatic bottom-up prediction error signals (Friston, 2005(Friston, , 2010Stefanics, Kimura, et al, 2011;Stefanics et al, 2014;Winkler, 2007), the neural correlates of updating of generative models of the environment by plastic changes in synaptic weights after the violation of the model's prediction by an unexpected event, i.e., a deviant stimulus. These generative models can be viewed as hierarchical representations of observed events of the environment, similar to predictive perceptual object representations suggested by Winkler and Czigler (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%