2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0373-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence Fusion for Real Time Click Fraud Detection and Prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Passive detection approaches, on the other hand, apply data analysis/mining techniques to recognize the behaviour pattern of traffics (e.g. [11,19,21,23,25,27]). While active detection techniques typically adopt the signature based detection mechanism to mark the fraudulent traffic, passive detection techniques can use both signature based (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive detection approaches, on the other hand, apply data analysis/mining techniques to recognize the behaviour pattern of traffics (e.g. [11,19,21,23,25,27]). While active detection techniques typically adopt the signature based detection mechanism to mark the fraudulent traffic, passive detection techniques can use both signature based (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By over sampling Class 2 records for 0 3 , and by under sampling Class 1 records for 0 4 we have achieved a higher F 1 -measure than that of 0 1 . In both of these cases we have tried to increase the class representation of Class 2 records.…”
Section: Class 2(non-smart Clickbot) When Equal Class Distribution Imentioning
confidence: 97%