2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-56538-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence in Favour of IMF Variations

Abstract: Abstract. The stellar initial mass function (IMF) determines the relative number of stars born at a given mass. Despite the tremendous effort to establish a universal IMF, the astronomical literature offers a wealth of diverse evidence for IMF variations. This review was prepared for a controversial debate at the conference "Starbursts -Near and Far" at Ringberg Castle, 2000, and gives a one-sided portrayal in favour of IMF variations. I will summarise the empirical evidence that the IMF varies with time, with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A severe counter argument against this scenario, however, might be the frequency of stellar masses in starbursts and globular clusters. Although no firm conclusion has been reached for starbursts (Eisenhauer 2001;Gilmore 2001), there is strong evidence that these regions form proportionally fewer low mass stars with masses around 1 M ⊙ than typically observed in our Galaxy. Globular clusters, however, are known to contain a large number of such low-mass stars.…”
Section: Super Star Clusterscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…A severe counter argument against this scenario, however, might be the frequency of stellar masses in starbursts and globular clusters. Although no firm conclusion has been reached for starbursts (Eisenhauer 2001;Gilmore 2001), there is strong evidence that these regions form proportionally fewer low mass stars with masses around 1 M ⊙ than typically observed in our Galaxy. Globular clusters, however, are known to contain a large number of such low-mass stars.…”
Section: Super Star Clusterscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Another explanation for the dispersion in N/O at a given metallicity involves differing contributions from primary and secondary nitrogen, which essentially amounts to variations of the initial mass function (IMF) from galaxy to galaxy. Despite some claims of IMF variations with time and environment (e.g., Eisenhauer 2001), there is no compelling evidence that the IMF varies in local galaxies (Parker & Garmany 1993;Hill, Madore & Freedman 1994;Hunter et al 1997). Preferential oxygen loss from galaxies with high N/O and more effective oxygen retention in galaxies with low N/O may be an additional explanation for producing N/O variations at constant metallicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%