Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools

Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Learn the Signs. Act Early. program, funded the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to convene an expert working group to revise its developmental surveillance checklists. The goals of the group were to identify evidence-informed milestones to include in CDC checklists, clarify when most children can be expected to reach a milestone (to discourage a wait-and-see approach), and support clinical judgment regarding screening between recommended ages. Subject matter experts identified by the AAP established 11 criteria for CDC milestone checklists, including using milestones most children (≥75%) would be expected to achieve by specific health supervision visit ages and those that are easily observed in natural settings. A database of normative data for individual milestones, common screening and evaluation tools, and published clinical opinion was created to inform revisions. Application of the criteria established by the AAP working group and adding milestones for the 15- and 30-month health supervision visits resulted in a 26.4% reduction and 40.9% replacement of previous CDC milestones. One third of the retained milestones were transferred to different ages; 67.7% of those transferred were moved to older ages. Approximately 80% of the final milestones had normative data from ≥1 sources. Social-emotional and cognitive milestones had the least normative data. These criteria and revised checklists can be used to support developmental surveillance, clinical judgment regarding additional developmental screening, and research in developmental surveillance processes. Gaps in developmental data were identified particularly for social-emotional and cognitive milestones.

Developmental Milestones of Infancy and Associations with Later Childhood Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study

“…The percentage of delays in milestone attainment in our study using the ABCD study is lower than the national estimates of development delays when applying the CDC guidelines on milestone attainment [ 58 ]. This might partly reflect errors in maternal recall or that the ABCD study has excluded children with several major neurological disorders, extreme birth outcomes, or birth complications that resulted in hospitalization for more than 1 month in the baseline enrollment [ 14 , 15 ].…”

Structural models of genome-wide covariance identify multiple common dimensions in autism

“…While some children with ASD reach intact structural language skills, others are delayed or never master functional spoken language (30). Here, our analyses uncovered, through identification of the language factor, that genomic covariance between (higher) language level and (earlier) age of self-feeding with a spoon, an important personal-social developmental milestone which typically developing children master at about 15-18 months (31,32). Notably, the genetic influences contributing to the age by which children self-feed with a spoon were distinct from genetic factors underlying other motor developmental achievements, such as crawling, sitting or walking, when studied in SPARK.…”

The associations between stunting and wasting at 12 months of age and developmental milestones delays in a cohort of Cambodian children

“…Also, a different set of observations was assessed during the seven follow-up surveys, to account for age. As Zubler et al 22 , we used the four developmental domains classification: motor, socio-emotional, language and cognitive. In the present study, we define milestones relating to motor skills as motor milestones and milestones relating to socio-emotional, linguistic and cognitive skills as cognitive milestones.…”