“…Despite the dominant role of agricultural sources of NH 3 at global or regional scales, recent observations have revealed that NH 3 concentrations are higher in densely populated urban areas that have low agricultural activity. − This finding posed a challenge to simulations driven by the current NH 3 emission inventories (EIs), as they could not accurately reproduce the observed high NH 3 concentrations in urban areas. − Meanwhile, more and more isotopic source apportionment results pointed out that nonagricultural activities, such as fossil fuel combustion, industrial processes, on-road traffic, , slip from power plants, and waste, presented a larger contribution to atmospheric NH 3 concentration in urban areas as compared to the agricultural sectors. − As shown in Table S1, during nonpollution periods, the contribution of nonagricultural sources to atmospheric NH 3 concentrations in the regions across China varied from 14 to 76%, and these values even reached 49–97% during haze periods. − However, the relative contributions of nonagricultural and agricultural sources to the total NH 3 emissions from the isotopic source apportionment results significantly differed from those derived from the bottom-up anthropogenic NH 3 EIs (e.g., the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China, MEIC) at the city level (Figure S1). − For instance, isotopic source apportionment revealed that fossil fuel was a significant source of NH 3 at an urban site in Beijing, contributing as much as 76%, whereas the corresponding value was only 35% based on the NH 3 EI .…”