Evidence of an increasing prevalence of diagnosed diabetes mellitus in the Poole area from 1983 to 1996

Abstract

This study examined the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes mellitus in a defined population over 13 years by undertaking cross-sectional surveys on 3 occasions between 1983 and 1996. The study population consisted of all the people registered with 10 general (primary care) practices at the time of each survey; 90660 in 1983/4; 97122 in 1988/9; and 86287 in 1996. Ascertainment of cases was by a surveillance programme in general practice and the hospital diabetes department. The number of diabetic patients increased significantly over the study period: in 1983/4, there were 917 patients, crude prevalence 1.01% (95% CI 0.95-1.08%); in 1988/9, 1150 patients, crude prevalence 1.17% (1.12-1.25%); and in 1996, 1604 patients, crude prevalence 1.86% (1.77-1.95%). The prevalence adjusted to the age and sex distribution of the UK was 0.97% (95% CI 0.90-1.03%) in 1983/4, 1.05% (0.99-1.11%) in 1988/9 and 1.55% (1.48-1.63%) in 1996. The main increase in prevalence was due to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, crude prevalence 0.75% (95% CI 0.69-0.81%) in 1983/4, 0.92% (0.86-0.98%) in 1988/9 and 1.52% (1.44-1.60%) in 1996 rather than Type 1 diabetes mellitus, crude prevalence 0.25% (0.21-0.28%) in 1983/4, 0.25% (0.22-0.28%) in 1988/9 and 0.34% (0.30-0.38%) in 1996. During the study period, the crude prevalence of diagnosed diabetes was significantly greater in men than women; in 1983/4 men 1.1% (95% CI 1.00-1.20%) versus women 0.93% (0.84-1.02%); in 1988/9, men 1.31% (1.21-1.41%) versus women 1.07% (0.98-1.16%); and in 1996, men 2.13% (2.00-2.27%) versus women 1.60% (1.49-1.72%). This difference was statistically significant in the 1988/9 and 1996 surveys. In conclusion, over 13 years there was a significant increase of 83.6% in the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes mellitus in the Poole area, with the UK age and sex adjusted prevalence increasing by 60.7%.

Prevalence, incidence and mortality of type 2 diabetes mellitus revisited: A prospective population-based study in The Netherlands (ZODIAC-1)

“…The largest absolute increase in known type 2 diabetes is found in the age group 70-79 and not between 45 and 65 as was predicted [7]. As compared to international prevalence rates we find a higher overall prevalence (2.9%) in The Netherlands than in Italy (2.5%) and the United Kingdom (UK) (2.0%) [35,36], and this also applies for the different age categories in these countries [37,38]. In the US, the overall prevalence among white non-Hispanics is higher in most publications: for the population aged >20, Harris et al [27] found a prevalence of 4.8% and Mokdad et al [39] found 5.9%, vs. 3.9% in this age category in our results.…”

Diabetes- and Nondiabetes-Related Lower Extremity Amputation Incidence Before and After the Introduction of Better Organized Diabetes Foot Care

“…Diabetes prevalence for each year was derived from the community diabetes register and was used to calculate DRLEA rates. An age-standardized diabetes prevalence of 1.74% in 1994 for the South Tees area is in keeping with other comparable determinations of diabetes prevalence at the time (22,23). The European standard population as defined by the World Health Organization in 1993 was used for direct age standardization (24).…”

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabetes

“…This trend started before, but was probably accelerated by the results of, the UKPDS. 9 There has also been an increase in the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes, 10,11 particularly among those from ethnic communities. 12 A recent study by the Office for National Statistics shows a rise in prevalence from 1994 to 1998.…”