2023
DOI: 10.3390/v15102021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Circulation and Phylogenetic Analysis of Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) in Wild Boar in South-East Italy

Gianfranco La Bella,
Maria Grazia Basanisi,
Gaia Nobili
et al.

Abstract: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an important cause of acute viral hepatitis in humans worldwide. The food-borne transmission of HEV appears to be a major route in Europe through the consumption of pork and wild boar meat. HEV epidemiology in wild boars has been investigated mainly in Northern and Central Italian regions, whilst information from Southern Italy is limited. We investigated the occurrence of HEV in wild boar in the Apulia and Basilicata regions (Southern Italy). Thirteen (10.4%) out of one hundred and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the sensitivity of the assay, the ddPCR protocol was applied to a selection of naturally HEV-contaminated wild boar muscle samples derived from hunting activities and intended for human consumption from the Apulia and Basilicata regions in the year 2022. These samples were previously analyzed using an RT-qPCR method, as previously described [ 3 , 32 ]. In detail, 36 samples were analyzed, of which 18 resulted positive and 18 resulted negative using the RT-qPCR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the sensitivity of the assay, the ddPCR protocol was applied to a selection of naturally HEV-contaminated wild boar muscle samples derived from hunting activities and intended for human consumption from the Apulia and Basilicata regions in the year 2022. These samples were previously analyzed using an RT-qPCR method, as previously described [ 3 , 32 ]. In detail, 36 samples were analyzed, of which 18 resulted positive and 18 resulted negative using the RT-qPCR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%