2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Facilitated Transport in Crowded Nanopores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CO 2 separation is significantly enhanced in the micropores with respect to the mesopores, where the CO 2 separation factors may reach values of up to 6. Self‐diffusivities, DCH4 and DCO2, along the mixture adsorption isotherms, in general anti‐correlate with the mixture adsorption behavior, that is, DCO2 is lower than DCH4, depending on pressure, by a factor of 2–4. In contrast to recent work on facilitated transport in crowded nanopores, 70 there was no indication that strongly adsorbing CO 2 can promote CH 4 diffusion by generating preferential transport pathways within the pores. Both DCH4 and DCO2 decrease with increasing pressure, and increase with increasing temperature.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The CO 2 separation is significantly enhanced in the micropores with respect to the mesopores, where the CO 2 separation factors may reach values of up to 6. Self‐diffusivities, DCH4 and DCO2, along the mixture adsorption isotherms, in general anti‐correlate with the mixture adsorption behavior, that is, DCO2 is lower than DCH4, depending on pressure, by a factor of 2–4. In contrast to recent work on facilitated transport in crowded nanopores, 70 there was no indication that strongly adsorbing CO 2 can promote CH 4 diffusion by generating preferential transport pathways within the pores. Both DCH4 and DCO2 decrease with increasing pressure, and increase with increasing temperature.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The adsorption energies (Δ E ads ) of CO 2 in calcite pores of widths 2.0, 2.5, 2.8, and 3.0 nm are presented in Figure . For comparison, we also ran simulations for water confined in silica pores of width 3 nm, following the algorithms described elsewhere …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool has been extensively used in literature for pure components 37 , 53 57 and mixtures. 58 , 59 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%