2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11293-018-9602-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Large-Scale Social Interactions in Mammography in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regular employees have been shown to have the highest breast cancer screening participation rate [ 27 , 56 , 57 ], whereas unemployed and self-employed individuals are less likely to participate [ 56 , 58 , 59 ]. Employees of organizations are more likely to be exposed to recommendations for breast cancer screening or attend organized breast cancer screenings, further promoting their participatory behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular employees have been shown to have the highest breast cancer screening participation rate [ 27 , 56 , 57 ], whereas unemployed and self-employed individuals are less likely to participate [ 56 , 58 , 59 ]. Employees of organizations are more likely to be exposed to recommendations for breast cancer screening or attend organized breast cancer screenings, further promoting their participatory behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two had larger samples including a French study with 136 women (a sub-set of a larger sample) [ 56 ], and one mixed method study in the UK with a sample of 26 women undertaking interviews and 479 women completing surveys [ 23 ]. One study did not report exact numbers [ 50 ]. Three studies [ 47 , 53 , 54 ] were undertaken by a group of researchers based in the US utilising the same sample of women, however each of the papers focused on different primary outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future intentions regarding screening varied significantly [odds ratio (OR) = 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2–5.4]. However, no sociodemographic differences were observed between screened and unscreened women regarding level of education, income, health risk behaviour (smoking, alcohol consumption), knowledge about the importance and the process of screening, or psychological features (fear of the test, fear of the results, fear of the disease, trust in screening impact) Gray 2018 USA [ 50 ] Not reported at individual level Quantitative using data from national cross-sectional survey Impact of social interaction on screening Education, income and employment 1 For all women, evidence was found of social interactions associated with individual’s education, employment, and poor health. In addition, number of age-group-specific social multipliers was found.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular employees have been shown to have the highest breast cancer screening participation rate [26,58,59], whereas unemployed and self-employed individuals are less likely to participate [58,60,61].…”
Section: Relationships Between Demographic Factors and Breast Cancer Screening Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%