2000
DOI: 10.2307/1565240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Lingual-Luring by an Aquatic Snake

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 169.230.243.252 on Sat,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Lind & Welsh Jr (1994) observed ontogenetic shifts in the foraging patterns of Oregon garter snakes Thamnophis atratus hydrophilus in a stream habitat. Neonates and juveniles fed on smaller prey along the stream margins, often employing ambush foraging strategies and lingual luring (Welsh Jr & Lind, 2000), whereas adults foraged widely over a greater variety of habitats in search of larger prey. Lind & Welsh Jr (1994) proposed differential prey availability, predation, morphology and physiological constraints (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Lind & Welsh Jr (1994) observed ontogenetic shifts in the foraging patterns of Oregon garter snakes Thamnophis atratus hydrophilus in a stream habitat. Neonates and juveniles fed on smaller prey along the stream margins, often employing ambush foraging strategies and lingual luring (Welsh Jr & Lind, 2000), whereas adults foraged widely over a greater variety of habitats in search of larger prey. Lind & Welsh Jr (1994) proposed differential prey availability, predation, morphology and physiological constraints (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The propensity for larger snakes to consume larger prey can result in different foraging strategies between adult and juvenile snakes (e.g. Lind & Welsh Jr, 1994;Savitzky & Burghardt, 2000;Welsh Jr & Lind, 2000). Many snake species also exhibit ontogenetic shifts in morphology or coloration that may influence prey capture or habitat use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All age classes of aquatic garter snakes feed on amphibians, with adults shifting to bigger prey such as giant salamanders and salmonids fishes that only the larger snakes can pursue in deeper, swifter waters (Lind and Welsh 1994). Young snakes forage on tadpoles and small fishes in shallow stream margins (Welsh and Lind 2000). Alluvial channels offer both higher numbers and a higher diversity of prey for all age classes in conjunction with abundant open areas for thermoregulation.…”
Section: Species Occurring In All Channel Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many functions are not performed constantly but only under specific circumstances. For example, the tongue of the juvenile aquatic garter snake Thamnophis atratus has the function to lure prey but it lures prey only when the snake is hunting (Welsh and Lind 2000). The p53 gene has the function to brake the cycle of cell growth but it brakes the cycle of cell growth only in circumstances where the cell is stressed or damaged (Vogelstein et al 2000).…”
Section: Transworld Identity or Trait-type Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%