2003
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/036)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Motor Programming Deficits in Children Diagnosed With DAS

Abstract: In this study the hypothesis of motor programming involvement in developmental apraxia of speech (DAS) was investigated by studying articulatory compensation. Five children with DAS and 5 normally speaking children (age 5;0 [years;months] to 6;10), and 6 adult women produced utterances in a normal speaking condition and in a bite-block condition in which the mandible was kept in a fixed position. Throughout the utterances, the course of the second formant was used to determine articulatory compensation and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…performance of the motor act are relatively intact and without significant intellectual deficit 2,15,16 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…performance of the motor act are relatively intact and without significant intellectual deficit 2,15,16 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies 15,17,18 observe that children with praxis alterations present difficulties to perform specific and voluntary motor actions of the speech sounds, and it is related to the phono-articulatory production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variables overall articulatory accuracy and consistency should be observed in children with speech sound disorders, because they may be one of the diagnostic markers for CAS (2,(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)16) . In the present research, this finding was confirmed because statistical significance was observed when these variables were compared between the different groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, segmental and suprasegmental characteristics may contribute to the composition of a diagnosis (8) . The following segmental characteristics are worth highlighting: articulatory groping, especially at the beginning of speech production; substitution errors; inconsistent speech exchanges; larger number of errors on vowels (8)(9)(10)(11)(12) . Regarding the suprasegmental characteristics, the following should be emphasized: inadequate prosody, mainly in inconsistent utterance of the accent (stressed syllable), and perception of nasopharyngeal resonance (8) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%