2018
DOI: 10.1111/jav.01656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of negative seasonal carry‐over effects of breeding ground mercury exposure on survival of migratory songbirds

Abstract: Mercury (Hg) is a well‐known global contaminant that persists in the environment. The organic form, methylmercury (MeHg) has been shown to adversely affect bird immune function, foraging behavior, navigation, and flight ability, which individually or together could reduce migration performance, and ultimately survival. Nestlings grow feathers at their natal site, and in North America many adult passerines undergo a complete feather molt prior to autumn migration at or near their breeding location. Body Hg is r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
10
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend has been reported elsewhere for other songbirds (Keller et al 2014;Ma et al 2018). One purported explanation for this phenomenon is that nestling birds have high energetic demands, especially for protein-rich foods, and, therefore, may be consuming higher volumes of insects and spiders, compared to older birds who may be eating proportionally more plant-based foods (Warner et al 2012;Ma et al 2018). This is likely true for chats because nestling chats are fed predominantly adult and larval insects (Schadd and Ritchison 1998) and occasionally berries (McKibbin and Bishop 2008) while adult chats consume roughly equal proportions of invertebrates and fruit (Howell 1932;Eckerle and Thompson 2020).…”
Section: Range-wide Hg Predictorssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This trend has been reported elsewhere for other songbirds (Keller et al 2014;Ma et al 2018). One purported explanation for this phenomenon is that nestling birds have high energetic demands, especially for protein-rich foods, and, therefore, may be consuming higher volumes of insects and spiders, compared to older birds who may be eating proportionally more plant-based foods (Warner et al 2012;Ma et al 2018). This is likely true for chats because nestling chats are fed predominantly adult and larval insects (Schadd and Ritchison 1998) and occasionally berries (McKibbin and Bishop 2008) while adult chats consume roughly equal proportions of invertebrates and fruit (Howell 1932;Eckerle and Thompson 2020).…”
Section: Range-wide Hg Predictorssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Hg levels in chat feathers were relatively low, 0.30 ± 0.02 μg/g dw. The average level of Hg in tail feathers for chats in our study is slightly lower than the 0.4 – 0.7 μg/g dw averages reported for other songbirds in terrestrial habitats without a known point source of contamination (Óvári et al 2018 ; Ma et al 2018 ; Stenhouse et al 2020 ). The two chats that fell within the low-risk category for blood equivalent levels (0.2–1.0 μg/g ww) were at the low end of this range with equivalent blood Hg levels of less than 0.3 μg/g ww.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…et al, 2016). Contrary to these benefits, our study also shows that reliance on aquatic prey increases Hg exposure, which can interfere with migration (Seewagen, 2018), reproduction (Jackson, Evers, Etterson, et al, 2011;Varian-Ramos et al, 2014), and survival (Ma et al, 2018) at environmentally relevant exposures. The varying reliance on aquatic prey among species and individuals complicates the calculation of Hg risk to riparian communities near contaminated water bodies because a more detailed understanding of foraging ecology (beyond broad classification of granivore, omnivore, or insectivore) is needed to assess risk.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%