2020
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of non‐stationary relationships between climate and forest responses: Increased sensitivity to climate change in Iberian forests

Abstract: Climate and forest structure are considered major drivers of forest demography and productivity. However, recent evidence suggests that the relationships between climate and tree growth are generally non-stationary (i.e. non-time stable), and it remains uncertain whether the relationships between climate, forest structure, demography and productivity are stationary or are being altered by recent climatic and structural changes. Here we analysed three surveys from the Spanish Forest Inventory covering c. 30 yea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We provide evidence for a significant within population variation in resilience, emphasising in our case study the relevance of microclimatic variability in the dynamics of rear edge populations. Furthermore, our results also support the existence of non‐stationary effects of climate determining forest growth responses (Table 2; Astigarraga et al., 2020; Carnicer, Domingo‐Marimon, et al., 2019; Peltier & Ogle, 2020). Finally, as previously mentioned, our results also emphasise an important role of other interacting global change drivers such as imbalanced recruitment due to increased herbivore pressure in locally altered, defaunated trophic networks, that we discuss in detail below.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We provide evidence for a significant within population variation in resilience, emphasising in our case study the relevance of microclimatic variability in the dynamics of rear edge populations. Furthermore, our results also support the existence of non‐stationary effects of climate determining forest growth responses (Table 2; Astigarraga et al., 2020; Carnicer, Domingo‐Marimon, et al., 2019; Peltier & Ogle, 2020). Finally, as previously mentioned, our results also emphasise an important role of other interacting global change drivers such as imbalanced recruitment due to increased herbivore pressure in locally altered, defaunated trophic networks, that we discuss in detail below.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Further studies should look at more recent data from NFIs and investigate whether drivers of mortality are changing over time, especially in the last decades, because temperatures, drought frequency and drought intensity are increasing (Astigarraga et al., 2020; Trenberth et al., 2014). Further investigation could also focus on whether drivers of mortality differ between deciduous and evergreen trees, as reported in other regions (Clark et al., 2011), or between shade‐tolerant and shade‐intolerant species (Luo & Chen, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, alleviation of plantplant competition though forest clearing seemed to have little scope to attenuate the negative impacts of drought, as shown by weak or no interactive effects of climate and tree cover or isolation. Management options aimed at decreasing adult tree mortality under climate change scenarios (Ruiz-Benito et al, 2013;Astigarraga et al, 2020) would then have little or no effects on tree recruitment.…”
Section: Managing Conflicting Effects Of Isolation and Climate Duringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing tree mortality associated to drought events (Jump et al, 2017) and to introduced pests (Roy et al, 2014) is threatening forests worldwide. Several recent papers conclude that forest thinning can be an efficient management option to deal with the negative effects of global change on tree growth and mortality (Ruiz-Benito et al, 2013;Astigarraga et al, 2020). Tree recruitment during benign inter-event periods may also compensate for increasing tree mortality (Jump et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%