1983
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)91044-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of prior pelvic inflammatory disease and its relationship toChlamydia trachomatis antibody and intrauterine contraceptive device use in infertile women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that among the cases, a high proportion of the titers that would normally be considered positive (1:32 and above) are at particularly high levels. This has been observed repeatedly in similar studies of TFI (11,15,16,30,31), and PID (10,18). In other words, women at higher risk of reproductive damage are more likely to be CT antibody positive, and are more likely to have particularly high titers than antibody-positive controls.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that among the cases, a high proportion of the titers that would normally be considered positive (1:32 and above) are at particularly high levels. This has been observed repeatedly in similar studies of TFI (11,15,16,30,31), and PID (10,18). In other words, women at higher risk of reproductive damage are more likely to be CT antibody positive, and are more likely to have particularly high titers than antibody-positive controls.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…The major studies of reproductive outcomes in women with PID (5-7) have been restricted to the small proportion of PID (8) that is diagnosed in hospital. In the 1980s and 1990s large numbers of serological case-control studies were carried out, comparing serum antibody levels in women with PID, EP or infertility, with controls (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). These studies invariably showed strong associations between detection of CT antibodies and reproductive damage, but it was difficult to draw quantitative conclusions from them, partly because of confounding between CT and other pathogens also implicated in reproductive morbidity (20), and partly because of the poor, and imprecisely known, sensitivity and specificity of the assays used (21,22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also confirmed that assessment of the endometrium for chlamydial infection by PCR analysis is a sound medical option for selected patients with infertility [19]. Gump et al [20] studied 204 infertile patients attending an infertility clinic, and all but 1 had negative cultures for C. trachomatis in cervical and endometrial specimens. These authors have found a significant correlation between prevalence of chlamydial antibodies and prior pelvic inflammatory disease, as documented by hysterosalpingography and/or laparoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Several workers have reported failure to culture Chlamydia trachomatis from the fallopian tubes, where cervical swabs were positive and the patients had tubal factor infertility [3,5,9,20]. This suggests either technical difficulties in isolation of the Chlamydia organism, or that the tubal occlusion is a host-determined response to past infection, as is suspected for trachoma [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlamydia trachomatis has been isolated from the fallopian tubes of females with acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) [2], Serological studies for Chlamydia have also established a link between infection with Chlamydia and adhesion formation. High serum titers of Chlamydial antibodies have been reported in infertile women with damaged fallopian tubes [3,4]. Between 64% and 91% of infertile females with tubal occlusion had antibodies to Chlamydia, a prevalence two to eight times greater than that found in females with other causes of infertility [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%