2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-009-0782-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of statistical epistasis between DISC1, CIT and NDEL1 impacting risk for schizophrenia: biological validation with functional neuroimaging

Abstract: The etiology of schizophrenia likely involves genetic interactions. DISC1, a promising candidate susceptibility gene, encodes a protein which interacts with many other proteins, including CIT, NDEL1, NDE1, FEZ1 and PAFAH1B1, some of which also have been associated with psychosis. We tested for epistasis between these genes in a schizophrenia case-control study using machine learning algorithms (MLAs: random forest, generalized boosted regression andMonteCarlo logic regression). Convergence of MLAs revealed a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because negative scores are due to random variation around zero of the poor predictor variables (Strobl et al, 2009), only variables with an importance score greater than the magnitude of the most negative score were selected for inclusion (Figure 1, Step 3). Following Nicodemus et al (2010), the number of variables retained in the final model was limited to 10 and was based on median permutation importance scores from 500 repetitions of the random forest analysis to ensure stability of importance score estimates. The removal of poor performing variables can increase overall accuracy by increasing the selection of relevant variables for the decision trees and therefore increasing the relevance of included data to outcome prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because negative scores are due to random variation around zero of the poor predictor variables (Strobl et al, 2009), only variables with an importance score greater than the magnitude of the most negative score were selected for inclusion (Figure 1, Step 3). Following Nicodemus et al (2010), the number of variables retained in the final model was limited to 10 and was based on median permutation importance scores from 500 repetitions of the random forest analysis to ensure stability of importance score estimates. The removal of poor performing variables can increase overall accuracy by increasing the selection of relevant variables for the decision trees and therefore increasing the relevance of included data to outcome prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although its impact on disease pathogenesis is debated (10,27), its connection to schizophrenia is credible (28), and its importance in corticogenesis is widely accepted (3,17,29). Likewise, evidence (30,31) associating NDEL1 to schizophrenia biology is debated (32). However, the crucial role of NDEL1, together with DISC1 in cortical layer formation (17,29), is well established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies investigating Ndel1 in SCZ have largely focused on its interaction with Disc1, with significant results only when haplotypes or interaction with Disc1 was considered (Burdick et al, 2008;Nicodemus et al, 2010). There are mixed results for Ndel1 main effects (Kahler et al, 2008;Tomppo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%