2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of the psychological effects of pseudoscientific information about COVID-19 on rural and urban populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, from the perspective of urban spatial pattern and urban form, the urban spatial agglomeration, polarization of urban spatial pattern, and the concept of centralized urban spatial planning is the objective conditions for the spread of the epidemic and the aggravation of its impact ( Pan, 2020 ). If people lived in urban city during the COVID-19 pandemic, they will become more prone to emotional issues, mood swings and depression ( Escola-Gascon et al., 2021 ). So physical and psychological health of urban residents are more worthy of our attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, from the perspective of urban spatial pattern and urban form, the urban spatial agglomeration, polarization of urban spatial pattern, and the concept of centralized urban spatial planning is the objective conditions for the spread of the epidemic and the aggravation of its impact ( Pan, 2020 ). If people lived in urban city during the COVID-19 pandemic, they will become more prone to emotional issues, mood swings and depression ( Escola-Gascon et al., 2021 ). So physical and psychological health of urban residents are more worthy of our attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most popular "explanatory" theories can be cited: the pandemic has been planned by Big Pharma, companies, the virus is produced in laboratory, 5 G produce clinical signs of Covid-19 infection. There are several reasons which might explain the development of pseudoscientific information: subjective misinterpretation of some evidence, called cognitive biases, magical or irrational meanings, a hidden mercantile interest and the credible, persuasion reaching the fragile emotional ground of the receptor [19].…”
Section: Infodemia Versus Scientific Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of their reliability showed that 10% are disinformation [3]. Escola-Gascón, Marín, Rusiñol, & Gallifa (2021) found that the ability to distinguish scientific information from pseudoscientific information predicts from 20 to 32% of psychological well-being, and according to the results of the study, residents of large cities find it more difficult to navigate the veracity of information, than rural residents, which is probably due to its redundancy in a large city as opposed to a rural area [4]. The negative impact of excess information was also confirmed in a study by Zhang, Zhang, Xiao, & Zheng (2021), who found that an abundance of information on social networks and a low level of its quality increased respondents' fatigue [5].…”
Section: Alarmism and Panic In The Information Field The So-called "Infodemy"mentioning
confidence: 99%