T he guideline for diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTIs) was established in the 1950s by Kass (1). Normal urine was assumed to be sterile, and patients diagnosed with UTIs had urine with bacterial counts of Ͼ10 5 CFU/ml. While this is still common practice today, Stamm et al. reported documented UTIs in women with colony counts between 10 2 and 10 5 in 1982 (2), and more recently, the interpretation of urine culture results has been further complicated by reports that urine is not necessarily sterile (3, 4). Moreover, diagnosis is even further complicated by the fact that urine samples are often contaminated with normal indigenous bacteria during the collection process. Finally, microbiology laboratories do not routinely work up (e.g., identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing) organisms grown from midstream urine when they are present at concentrations below 10 4 CFU/ml. Most laboratories have complex protocols guiding what types and how many different organisms to work up when there are between 10 4 and 10 5 CFU/ml. Some uropathogens, as noted, above, can cause urinary tract infections at significantly lower numbers (10 2 CFU/ml) while contaminants can be present at higher numbers (10 3 to 10 5 CFU/ml). What's a lab to do? The American Society for Microbiology Cumitech 2C recommends two different protocols for processing urine specimens for culture (5). For specimens obtained noninvasively, 0.001 ml of clean voided midstream urine is cultured. However, for specimens collected by straight "in-and-out" catheterization or similar methods such as cystoscopy, 0.01 ml of urine is cultured. For these specimens, identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing are recommended for up to 2 isolates with colony counts of Ͼ10 3 /ml. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Price and colleagues (6) studied urine cultures from a defined group of female patients who were being seen at a pelvic medicine and reproductive clinic and who answered either "yes" or "no" to the subjective question "Do you feel you have a UTI?" Those who said "yes" were enrolled in one group, and those who said "no" were enrolled in the control group.Their working hypothesis was that even small numbers of bacteria could be pathogenic in the bladder of these selected patients. To test this hypothesis, urine was collected directly from the bladder by catheterization, and 0.1 ml, 0.01 ml, and 0.001 ml were plated on multiple agar plates under multiple incubation conditions (ambient air, CO 2 , anaerobically). These expanded-spectrum enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC) results were compared to the standard urine culture results. Standard urine culture changed during the study but always included plating 0.001 ml on a blood agar plate and a MacConkey agar plate. Initial samples were cultured for 24 h without CO 2 , while later samples were cultured with 5% CO 2 for 24 (MacConkey agar) or 48 (blood agar) hours. Not surprisingly, catheterized urine from women with self-reported urinary symptoms, with as few as 10 2 C...