2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of uneven selective pressure on different subsets of the conserved human genome; implications for the significance of intronic and intergenic DNA

Abstract: Background: Human genetic variation produces the wide range of phenotypic differences that make us individual. However, little is known about the distribution of variation in the most conserved functional regions of the human genome. We examined whether different subsets of the conserved human genome have been subjected to similar levels of selective constraint within the human population. We used set theory and high performance computing to carry out an analysis of the density of Single Nucleotide Polymorphis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Collectively, 951,507 biallelic SNPs (Coverage ≥10X and ≤60X) were predicted, with an estimated average genome-wide density of approximately 1.0 SNP/1.00 Kbp for the autosomes (i.e., Z and W excluded by blastn; Table S10). This estimate is higher than for the domestic turkey [16] and lower than for the zebra finch [17], with our estimate reflecting an overall average genome-wide autosomal distribution [41][42] as predicted by blastn. As expected, application of the same SNP detection methods [1] to the repeat-masked scaffolded de novo assembly (SMACv1.1, chicken and zebra finch repeat libraries), which contains N’s representing gaps, provided evidence for fewer biallelic SNPs (n = 890,527; Coverage ≥10X and ≤60X; Table S11), and a somewhat lower overall average SNP density.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Collectively, 951,507 biallelic SNPs (Coverage ≥10X and ≤60X) were predicted, with an estimated average genome-wide density of approximately 1.0 SNP/1.00 Kbp for the autosomes (i.e., Z and W excluded by blastn; Table S10). This estimate is higher than for the domestic turkey [16] and lower than for the zebra finch [17], with our estimate reflecting an overall average genome-wide autosomal distribution [41][42] as predicted by blastn. As expected, application of the same SNP detection methods [1] to the repeat-masked scaffolded de novo assembly (SMACv1.1, chicken and zebra finch repeat libraries), which contains N’s representing gaps, provided evidence for fewer biallelic SNPs (n = 890,527; Coverage ≥10X and ≤60X; Table S11), and a somewhat lower overall average SNP density.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The remaining variation does not appear to contribute to an alloreactive mismatch. Introns might be expected to experience less selective pressure compared with protein‐encoding exons and therefore might exhibit more sequence variation; however, selective pressure may also conserve noncoding regions that control gene expression or impact sites in the vicinity of selected exon variants . The data presented here suggest that the introns will be highly conserved; further data on noncoding sequences will be needed to support this observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…ERa gene polymorphisms described here are located in intron 1; however, it is not clear how intronic polymorphisms could affect cartilage metabolism. There is recent evidence that in human genome, intronic and exonic portions have been subjected to the same degree of selective pressure, and that the intronic portion possesses a similar level of functional importance to that of the exonic [19]. Therefore, intronic polymorphisms could have functional consequences in OA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%