2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0124-00642012000200011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of zoonotic Chlamydophila psittaci transmission in a population at risk in Zulia state, Venezuela

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other potential modes of transmission, such as exposure to urban pigeon colonies, have been reported but appear to be uncommon. [42][43][44][45][46][47] Clinical signs and symptoms…”
Section: Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other potential modes of transmission, such as exposure to urban pigeon colonies, have been reported but appear to be uncommon. [42][43][44][45][46][47] Clinical signs and symptoms…”
Section: Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to transmission through direct contact with birds, particularly if the birds were ill or recently acquired, human infection can also result from indirect environmental exposure. 6,12,21,28,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] In this compendium, C psittaci infection in birds is referred to as avian chlamydiosis. Chlamydial organisms have been isolated from more than 460 bird species from 30 orders 49 but are most commonly identified in psittacine (parrot-type) birds, especially cockatiels and budgerigars (also called parakeets or budgies).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In central area of Argentina 21% (9/43) patients in whom psittacosis was suspected presented positive molecular results for C. psittaci [17]. In Venezuela, 8·3% (8/96) prevalence of C. psittaci infection was determine in individuals living in areas massive colonized by pigeons [18]. Some authors believe that psittacosis is an underestimate disease, given that even a brief exposure can lead to a systemic infection, and testing for C. psittaci is often not included in routine microbiological diagnostic panels for pneumonia [17, 19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%