Evidence on the role of journal editors in the COVID19 infodemic: metascientific study analyzing COVID19 publication rates and patterns

Abstract

Objective: Infodemic, a neologism characterizing an excess of fast-tracked low quality publications, has been employed to depict the scientific research response to the COVID19 crisis. The concept relies on the presumed exponential growth of research output. This study aimed to test the COVID19 infodemic claim by assessing publication rates and patterns of COVID19-related research and a control, a year prior. Design: A Reproduction Number of Publications (Rp) was conceived. It was conceptualized as a division of a week incidence of publications by the average of publications of the previous week. The publication growth rates of preprint and MEDLINE-indexed peer-reviewed literature on COVID19 were compared using the correspondent Influenza output, a year prior, as control. Rp for COVID19 and Influenza papers and preprints were generated and compared and then analyzed in light of the respective growth patterns of their papers and preprints. Main outcomes: Output growth rates and Reproduction Number of Publications (Rp). Results: COVID19 peer-reviewed papers showed a fourteen fold increase compared to Influenza papers. COVID19 papers and preprints displayed an exponential growth curve until the 20th week. COVID19 papers displayed Rp=3.17±0.72, while the control group presented Rp=0.97±0.12. Their preprints exhibited Rp=2.18±0.54 and Rp=0.97±0.27 respectively, with no evidence of exponential growth in the control group, as its Rp remained approximately one. Conclusions: COVID19 publications displayed an epidemic pattern. As the growth patterns of COVID19 peer-reviewed articles and preprints were similar, and the majority of the COVID19 output came from indexed journals, not only authors but also editors appear to had played a significant part on the infodemic. Review protocol: https://osf.io/q3zkw/?view_only=ff540dc4630b4c6e9a2639d732047324 Ethical aspects: No ethical clarence was required as all analyzed data were publicly available.

COVID-19 and the Infodemic: An Overview of the Role and Impact of Social Media, the Evolution of Medical Knowledge, and Emerging Problems

“…The integration with studies also coming from these preprint sites allowed us to close the study with an even broader perspective by integrating the study conducted so far with previews of the directions of research in this field. Hot topics [52,53] for research development emerged from these databases. A prime example is the role of editors in peer-reviewed journals in controlling the infodemic by avoiding excessive volumes of rapid COVID-19 publications with sometimes hasty peer reviews [52].…”

“…Hot topics [52,53] for research development emerged from these databases. A prime example is the role of editors in peer-reviewed journals in controlling the infodemic by avoiding excessive volumes of rapid COVID-19 publications with sometimes hasty peer reviews [52]. Another example [53] relates to how the infodemic has a different behavior based on the languages used.…”

“…This review took into consideration a limited number of sources (Google for the first point of view; PubMed for the other two) and only sources in English. However, it should be noted that (a) an important part of scientific production and direct or related initiatives in this area are in national languages other than English (as we highlighted in the case of the Italian CENSIS report [6]); (b) other databases, such as those of the preprints, could provide in real time interesting indications of the development directions on the research in progress [47,48,52,53].…”