2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence on treatment of clavicle fractures

Christian von Rüden,
Julia Rehme-Röhrl,
Peter Augat
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our reference table, the maximal clavicular diameter differs only by one millimetre. In addition to the site dependency from right/left clavicle diameters, it enables thoughts about planning plate osteosynthesis for clavicle fractures with more precise preparation, which seems to lead to better outcomes [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our reference table, the maximal clavicular diameter differs only by one millimetre. In addition to the site dependency from right/left clavicle diameters, it enables thoughts about planning plate osteosynthesis for clavicle fractures with more precise preparation, which seems to lead to better outcomes [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in the current study, operative clavicle fracture treatment was only performed when the patients' overall clinical status was good enough for surgery. Furthermore, it was accepted as a relatively minor operative procedure compared to polytraumatization [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional literature shows a good evolution in non-surgical treatment in fractures of the middle third of the clavicle. 5 While surgical treatment was recommended for cases with bone exposure, associated neurovascular injury, floating shoulder, scapulothoracic dissociation, polytraumatized, 6 and presence of bone shortening equal to or greater than 15 to 20 millimeters, 7 , 8 the latter being the main predisposing factor for non-bone union, identified in 15% to 21% of cases. 9 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%