2016
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence supporting laparoscopic major hepatectomy

Abstract: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been increasing in frequency with over 9,000 cases done worldwide. Benefits of laparoscopic resection include less blood loss, smaller incisions, decreased postoperative morbidity, and shorter length of stay compared to open liver resection. With increased experience, several centers have reported series of laparoscopic major hepatectomy, although this represents only about 25% of total LLR performed. Evidence is accumulating to support laparoscopic major hepatectomy with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…370 Reported morbidity and mortality in major laparoscopic-robotic LR series collected in very early and early HCC are 10-15% (including laparotomic conversions) and 1%, respectively. 371,372 d. For single HCC >3 cm LR is cost-effective. When the perspectives on treatment effectiveness and cost are combined and metaanalysed to replace the absence of RCTs in patients receiving resection or ablation for early tumours, LR prevails over ablation in single HCC above 3 cm, while uncertainty still remains for nodules 2-3 cm in size.…”
Section: Extent Of Hepatectomy and Surgical Invasivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…370 Reported morbidity and mortality in major laparoscopic-robotic LR series collected in very early and early HCC are 10-15% (including laparotomic conversions) and 1%, respectively. 371,372 d. For single HCC >3 cm LR is cost-effective. When the perspectives on treatment effectiveness and cost are combined and metaanalysed to replace the absence of RCTs in patients receiving resection or ablation for early tumours, LR prevails over ablation in single HCC above 3 cm, while uncertainty still remains for nodules 2-3 cm in size.…”
Section: Extent Of Hepatectomy and Surgical Invasivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These promising results have encouraged surgeons to further explore the application of laparoscopic techniques in complex surgery. In fact, a similar process can also be observed in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) [41] and laparoscopic hepatectomy [42], which was initially controversial but has been gradually accepted. For example, LPD was once regarded as the Mt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In order to reduce surgical stress and improve outcomes, in the last ten years, laparoscopic and robotic techniques have been applied in liver surgery, which have been shown to be safe and effective approaches, with morbidity and mortality in major laparoscopic-robotic series in very early and early HCC of 10–15% and 1%, respectively [ 35 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]. Laparoscopic-robotic resection of HCC, in particular when the tumours are mainly located in superficial peripheral positions of the liver, provides optimal survival outcomes and minimizes complications and hospital stay [ 57 , 59 ].…”
Section: Hcc Treatment In Elderly Patients According To Bclc Stagementioning
confidence: 99%