1997
DOI: 10.1042/bj3260837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence that human class Theta glutathione S-transferase T1-1 can catalyse the activation of dichloromethane, a liver and lung carcinogen in the mouse: Comparison of the tissue distribution of GST T1-1 with that of classes Alpha, Mu and Pi GST in human

Abstract: The cDNA encoding human glutathione S-transferase (GST) T1 has been expressed as two recombinant forms in Escherichia coli that could be purified by affinity chromatography on either IgGSepharose or nickel-agarose ; one form of the transferase was synthesized from the pALP 1 expression vector as a Staphylococcus aureus protein A fusion, whereas the other form was synthesized from the pET-20b expression vector as a C-terminal polyhistidine-tagged recombinant. The yields of the two purified recombinant proteins … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
83
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…44 Although GST enzymes generally lead to conjugation and elimination of carcinogenic and toxic metabolites, some instances have been reported where GSTT leads to carcinogen activation. 45 Finally, it is also possible that GSTT could catalyze the conjugation and removal of anticarcinogenic components of the diet such as isothiocyanates, so deletion of the gene would be protective in certain circumstances. 46,47 Even when the potential combined effect of GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null and NAT2 slow genotypes was examined, no evidence of an interaction between these polymorphisms was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 Although GST enzymes generally lead to conjugation and elimination of carcinogenic and toxic metabolites, some instances have been reported where GSTT leads to carcinogen activation. 45 Finally, it is also possible that GSTT could catalyze the conjugation and removal of anticarcinogenic components of the diet such as isothiocyanates, so deletion of the gene would be protective in certain circumstances. 46,47 Even when the potential combined effect of GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null and NAT2 slow genotypes was examined, no evidence of an interaction between these polymorphisms was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately attempts in multiple laboratories to demonstrate glutathione S-transferase enzyme activity for Ure2 have been unsuccessful (7,16,20). Although negative results are rarely reported in detail, the lack of success might derive from inherent instability in the enzyme, an observed characteristic of glutathione S-transferases, or from performing the assay with substrates that are not the preferred ones for the putative transferase (25)(26)(27)(28). The difficulties experienced in attempts to assay an enzyme activity prompted us to take a step backward from in vitro assays and ask more simply whether Ure2 is required for protection of cells against the growth-inhibitory effects of compounds reported to be glutathione S-transferase substrates in other organisms.…”
Section: Ure2 Is Required For Protection Against Heavy Metals-ure2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,[52][53][54] These findings are not surprising, since, although GSTs are generally recognized as detoxifying enzymes, they could also be involved in the generation and activation of toxic compounds. 55,56 Recent evidences support the role of bioactivation by GSTs. 57 …”
Section: Assessment Of the Role Of Selected Gst Genes Towards Susceptmentioning
confidence: 99%